1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.118839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B diffusion and clustering in ion implanted Si: The role of B cluster precursors

Abstract: A comprehensive model for B implantation, diffusion and clustering is presented. The model, implemented in a Monte Carlo atomistic simulator, successfully explains and predicts the behavior of B under a wide variety of implantation and annealing conditions by invoking the formation of immobile precursors of B clusters, prior to the onset of transient enhanced diffusion. The model also includes the usual mechanisms of Si self-interstitial diffusion and B kick-out. The immobile B cluster precursors, such as BI2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
128
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
128
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the lower panel, the simulations of the Si interstitials distribution and the mobile and immobile fractions of B profiles are reported. Basing on these results, it was argued that BICs: (i) form only in the region of high B concentration and high I supersaturation during implantation (as calculated from the MARLOWE code 79 ), (ii) nucleate starting from an immobile precursor (BI 2 ) during implantation or at the very early stages of annealing, (iii) are of small size, with less than six atoms (so well below the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) detection limit), (iv) their thermal evolution proceeds via the emission of self-interstitials first and then B interstitials, up to the cluster dissolution. 80 Several studies approached the phenomenon of B-I clustering in crystalline Si from a theoretical point of view, calculating the formation energy and structure of each plausible B-I cluster, the energetically favored B:Si stoichiometry, the possible pathways for BIC growth and dissolution and the interactions with I-type defects.…”
Section: B-i Clusters Formation and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the lower panel, the simulations of the Si interstitials distribution and the mobile and immobile fractions of B profiles are reported. Basing on these results, it was argued that BICs: (i) form only in the region of high B concentration and high I supersaturation during implantation (as calculated from the MARLOWE code 79 ), (ii) nucleate starting from an immobile precursor (BI 2 ) during implantation or at the very early stages of annealing, (iii) are of small size, with less than six atoms (so well below the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) detection limit), (iv) their thermal evolution proceeds via the emission of self-interstitials first and then B interstitials, up to the cluster dissolution. 80 Several studies approached the phenomenon of B-I clustering in crystalline Si from a theoretical point of view, calculating the formation energy and structure of each plausible B-I cluster, the energetically favored B:Si stoichiometry, the possible pathways for BIC growth and dissolution and the interactions with I-type defects.…”
Section: B-i Clusters Formation and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15), implanted with Si ions, allowed to develop an atomistic simulation for B-I clustering and diffusion, disentangling the B doping from the implantation damage. 79,80 In the upper panel of Fig. 15, the chemical profiles of B delta doped layers are plotted before and after implantation and annealing, evidencing both the diffusion and the clustering caused by implantation.…”
Section: B-i Clusters Formation and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present interest in this method concerns primarily defects in semiconductors that are produced by low-energy ion implantation. 8,1,9 For this situation, the computation of the scattering intensity is complicated by the presence of the surface and the correlations between the vacancy and interstitial defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthy to note that less B diffusion is observed in the shallow B spike ͑initially covered by F͒ than in the deepest one but this also happens for the Si + implant. This behavior could be explained by the temporal immobilization of B due to the formation of BICs in the damaged region of the F + or Si + implants, 9 which reduces the amount of B available for diffusion. The additional damage cascades generated by the F + coimplantation with Si + would favor BIC formation in the shallow B spike, and thus, a reduction in B diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%