2008
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463061463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axillary Lymph Nodes: US-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Initial Staging of Breast Cancer—Correlation with Primary Tumor Size

Abstract: US-guided FNA of axillary lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer had a sensitivity that increased with increasing size of the primary tumor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
128
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
128
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…García-Ortega et al refer 6.9% [19], Britton et al 12% [23], and Koelliker et al [24] 13%. All 5 patients had tumors between 13 and 25 mm and the primary therapeutic option was changed in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…García-Ortega et al refer 6.9% [19], Britton et al 12% [23], and Koelliker et al [24] 13%. All 5 patients had tumors between 13 and 25 mm and the primary therapeutic option was changed in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of ultrasonography (US)-guided fi ne-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and molecular analysis by using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction is emerging as a viable, minimally invasive alternative to SLNB (10)(11)(12)(13). Although axillary US imaging can provide morphologic information, such as size and shape of lymph nodes, it cannot be used to specifi cally identify SLNs, reducing the sensitivity of US-guided FNAB ( 14 ). Noninvasive fl uorescence imaging has been used to identify SLNs by using indocyanine green dye (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have reported the sensitivity and specificity rates of FNAB between 25-95% and 97-100%, respectively (8,14,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). False positive results has been reported around 1.4-1.6% (20,23,30), and false negative rates as 8-12% (15,23,24,26,(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Sensitivity and Specificity Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%