“…Klauer et al (1997) hypothesized that this pattern of results may have been due to the fact that the participants attempted to actively (over)correct for the influence of the primes when the SOA was long (see also J. Glaser & Banaji, 1999;Greenwald & Banaji, 1995;Strack, Schwarz, Bless, Kübler, & Wänke, 1993). On the other hand, one could also expect slow-acting, expectancy-based response strategies to produce CP effects at long SOAs (see de Groot, 1984;den Heyer, Briand, & Dannenbring, 1983;Neely, 1977;Neely, Keefe, & Ross, 1989;Perea & Rosa, 2002;Seidenberg, Waters, Sanders, & Langer, 1984;Tweedy, Lapinski, & Schvaneveldt, 1977).…”