Awareness and Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (Cbct) of Turkish Dentist

Abstract

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate competence and awareness of dentists in Turkey with regard to use and application of cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 12 questions was sent to approximately 2.000 dentists via electronic media. Feedback was received from 105 dentists. Completed questionnaires were examined and statistically analyzed using the results and chisquare test. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Of the dentists participating in the study, 91.4% reported they had CBCT awareness. In the study, 55.2% of dentists reported that they could interpret CBCT images. Of those who had knowledge about CBCT, 66.7% think that the training they get during undergraduate education is not enough. According to the study, CBCT was found to be used most commonly during implant planning (78.1%). This was followed by cyst-tumor (9.5%), orthodontic causes (1%) and trauma (1%). Conclusion: Today, Turkish dentists have a high awareness of CBCT. However, the interpret ability on CBCT images is not at the desired level. To meet the need for CBCT training of dentists in Turkey, hands-on training could be given at the universities along with theoretical lectures and practical courses rather than theoretical knowledge given by oral and maxillofacial radiology specialists after undergraduate education could be enhanced.

Evaluation of Referral of Cone-Beam Ct Investigations at a Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Clinic of University Hospital

“…For these reasons, the most frequently used indication of CBCT request is dental implant planning. 10,11 The results of the present study also confirm the same in parallel with this situation with percentage of 40% over the age groups of 30, and the most requests were performed in 54-65 age group for dental implant planning on the side. According to findings, the other most preferred CBCT indications were determination of relation between impacted third molar and mandibular canal, assessment of odontogenic cysts and tumors and surnumerary and/or impacted teeth (except third molars) which were requested more than dental implant planning for age groups under age of.…”

“…CBCT examinations start to replace 2D imaging in recent years. 10,11 The main parameter that limits the use of CBCT especially in children is radiation dose, when it is compared with panoramic imaging. But, CBCT is still a good alternative to CT as an imaging technique of bony structures, because of lower irradiation in comparison with CT. 12,13 Also, guidelines recommend CBCT as an alternative 3D imaging tool to CT when necessary.…”

Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: practitioner awareness and attitudes. A scoping review

“…A total of 31 papers examined aspects of respondents’ knowledge or awareness of CBCT. Of these studies, four appear to have been well‐conducted, 10,12,19 15 were moderately robust in their findings, 1,13‐15,18,21,23,24,26,27,29,39,41,45,46 and 12 had questionable evidence due to the low strength of their methodology 16,17,20,22,28,31‐33,36‐38,40,42,43,47 …”

“…30 studies examined participants’ attitudes towards CBCT education and use in the dental setting. Of these 30 papers, two were well‐designed, 19,35 15 were adequately conducted, 1,11,13‐15,18,21,24‐27,34,39,41,44 and 12 provided questionable evidence 16,22,28,31‐33,36‐38,40,42,43 …”

“…Practitioner confidence was the least reported domain, with only four studies reporting on confidence in factors surrounding the use of cone beam technology. Of these papers, one was well‐conducted, 19 three provided moderate‐strength evidence, 13,25,34 and one provided low‐strength evidence which will not be detailed below 43 …”