2020
DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding the Other Side?

Abstract: Abstract. Partisan selective exposure, the phenomenon of selectively attending to information that is in line with one’s political views, has received extensive research attention. Researchers have thus far largely neglected, however, to examine the tendency to avoid attitude-discrepant information, that is, selective avoidance. Selective avoidance can be considered a different phenomenon that is not necessarily implied by, nor only occurs simultaneously with, selective exposure. This study investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mixed results concerning this question might be rooted in the focus on either exposure or avoidance in prior research. An increasing relevance of political interest for searching out political information (e.g., Hopmann et al, 2016), does not necessarily entail the same for the avoidance of news (see also selective exposure and avoidance, e.g., Schmuck et al, 2020). Further, our paper highlights the relevance of a common theoretical understanding of news-avoiders and comparable measures in the field, by demonstrating that changes in operationalization can lead to dissimilar results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Mixed results concerning this question might be rooted in the focus on either exposure or avoidance in prior research. An increasing relevance of political interest for searching out political information (e.g., Hopmann et al, 2016), does not necessarily entail the same for the avoidance of news (see also selective exposure and avoidance, e.g., Schmuck et al, 2020). Further, our paper highlights the relevance of a common theoretical understanding of news-avoiders and comparable measures in the field, by demonstrating that changes in operationalization can lead to dissimilar results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Self-reported qualitative answers were included to establish if eye-tracking results mirrored participants' introspection on what they considered traits of real/fake news. Online webcambased eye-tracking was chosen over surveys and self-report studies due to its more unbiased collection of data (Schmuck et al, 2020). By using a participant's computer webcam at home versus an eye-tracking lab, it is suggested a better replicate of a real-world environment is provided (Hummel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Eye-trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, tomando en cuenta algunos datos y argumentos que se describen arriba, como que la mayor parte de la sociedad está mal informada (Achen y Bartels, 2017). Así como el fenómeno de exposición selectiva partidista y evitación de la información política contraria al posicionamiento político del receptor (Schmuck et al, 2020). Se propone el uso del otorgamiento de un sello de calidad a aquellos medios de comunicación que sean confiables, plurales y libres de prejuicios después de ser evaluados por algún organismo independiente, tal y como proponen López-Raventós, Padrós-Blázquez y Navarro-Contreras (2023).…”
Section: Revista Latinoamericana Ogmiosunclassified
“…Respecto al uso de la publicidad, es importante señalar que los gastos en algunos casos se han multiplicado por ocho en los últimos años (Crettaz, 2019). Además de que se ha descrito el fenómeno conocido como exposición selectiva partidista, que consiste en atender de forma selectiva aquella información cercana al propio posicionamiento político y a evitar aquellos anuncios de contenido político contrario a la propia ideología (Schmuck et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified