Utilising online eye-tracking to discern the impacts of cultural backgrounds on fake and real news decision-making

Abstract

IntroductionOnline eye-tracking has been used in this study to assess the impacts of different cultural backgrounds on information discernment. An online platform called RealEye allowed participants to engage in the eye-tracking study from their personal computer webcams, allowing for higher ecological validity and a closer replication of social media interaction.MethodsThe study consisted of two parts with a total of five visuals of social media posts mimicking news posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. Participants were asked to view examples of real and fake news taken from a news fact-checking website, Snopes, and their eye movements were recorded during the process. Participants were recruited through Prolific and SONA; the total sample size for study 1.1 was 29 participants, and the total for study 1.2 was 25 participants, after removing poor eye-tracking data. A total of five visual images comprising true and false news were shown to the participant, study 1.1 had three examples and study 1.2 had two examples. There were two main cultural backgrounds in focus: participants born in China or the United Kingdom.ResultsResults suggested that participants follow a similar visual pattern of attention to Areas of Interest (AOIs) on the posts, which leads us to believe that due to the global standardisation of popular social media platforms, a bias might have occurred during information discernment.DiscussionIt is suggested that regardless of country background, users may have similar eye-tracking results while viewing a social media post because social media platform formats are standardised globally. Further research would recommend looking at language and linguistic traits when seeking differences between country backgrounds during online information discernment.

Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society

“…205 [254] Rising tides or rising stars? : Dynamics of shared attention on twitter during media events 206 [255] Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: Anorexia on youtube 209 [258] Utilising online eye-tracking to discern the impacts of cultural backgrounds on fake and real news decision-making 210 [259] Top 100 #PCOS influencers: Understanding who, why and how online content for PCOS is influenced 211 [260] Twitter Trends for Celiac Disease and the Gluten-Free Diet: Cross-sectional Descriptive Analysis 214 [263] The influence of fake news on face-trait learning 215 [264] COVID-Related Misinformation Migration to BitChute and Odysee 216 [265] Sending News Back Home: Misinformation Lost in Transnational Social Networks 217 [266] Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic 218 [267] Organization and evolution of the UK far-right network on Telegram 219 [268] Predictive modeling for suspicious content identification on Twitter 220 [269] Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: current status and future directions 221 [270] Cross-platform information spread during the January 6th capitol riots 222 [271] Combating multimodal fake news on social media: methods, datasets, and future perspective 223 [272] In. Tackling fake news in socially mediated public spheres: A comparison of Weibo and WeChat 249 [298] The Networked Context of COVID-19 Misinformation: Informational Homogeneity on YouTube at the Beginning of the Pandemic 250 [299] Twelve tips to make successful medical infographics 251 [300] TClustVID: A novel machine learning classification model to investigate topics and sentiment in COVID-19 tweets 252 [301] Cognitive and affective responses to political disinformation in Facebook 253 [302] Experience: Managing misinformation in social media-insights for policymakers from Twitter analytics 254 [303] Hepatitis E vaccine in China: Public health professional perspectives on vaccine promotion and strategies for control (Continued )…”