2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10946-011-9232-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average transmission times for the tunneling of wave packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top plot of Figure 6 shows that for the less opaque barrier there exists a (very small) probability to observe a superluminal tunneling time. Even if this possibility cannot be precluded in principle, (see, e.g., [16]), in the present case the possibility of emergence of such small times was expected, since at t = 0 there was a significant portion of the wave packet (roughly 27%) penetrating the whole distance of the barrier, and this has an important contribution to the emergence of small times in the clock's readings associated to the transmitted particle. On the other hand, the top plot of Figure 7 shows that for the thicker barrier the probability for superluminal times is negligible -the portion of the wave packet already inside the barrier at t = 0 is the same (∼ 27%), but the wave packet penetrates proportionally a smaller distance inside the barrier and, thus, it does not contribute in a significant way to the emergence of very small times in the clock readings.…”
Section: ∂ω ∂Qmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The top plot of Figure 6 shows that for the less opaque barrier there exists a (very small) probability to observe a superluminal tunneling time. Even if this possibility cannot be precluded in principle, (see, e.g., [16]), in the present case the possibility of emergence of such small times was expected, since at t = 0 there was a significant portion of the wave packet (roughly 27%) penetrating the whole distance of the barrier, and this has an important contribution to the emergence of small times in the clock's readings associated to the transmitted particle. On the other hand, the top plot of Figure 7 shows that for the thicker barrier the probability for superluminal times is negligible -the portion of the wave packet already inside the barrier at t = 0 is the same (∼ 27%), but the wave packet penetrates proportionally a smaller distance inside the barrier and, thus, it does not contribute in a significant way to the emergence of very small times in the clock readings.…”
Section: ∂ω ∂Qmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Still, the intrinsic experimental difficulties associated both with the measurements and the interpretation of the results have, so far, prevented an elucidation of the problem and, in fact, contradictory results persist, with some experiments obtaining a finite non-zero result [3,6] and others compatible with instantaneous tunneling [4]. It should be noticed that the similarity between Schrödinger and Helmholtz equations allows for analogies between quantum tunneling of massive particles and photons [7], and a noninstantaneous tunneling time is supported by this analogy and experiments measuring photonic tunneling times [8], as well as by many theoretical calculations based on both the Schrödinger (for reviews see, e.g., [1,2]) and the Dirac equations (e.g., [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that, for wave packets of finite width, such average transmission time does not saturate in the limit of opaque barriers for symmetric potentials, which is an important result associated with the Hartman effect [15]. One must notice, however, that the absence of saturation is not enough to prevent apparent superluminal speeds in the relativistic case [29] but, as pointed by Davies [30], the SWP clock times can be interpreted as weak values [31,32], and such results are not unexpected for weak values when they are associated with small probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in [28,29] were obtained considering symmetric potentials, in which case the average transmission (reflection) SWP times coincide with the average of the dwell time over the transmitted (reflected) sub-ensemble [28] (as a consequence of the identity between the stationary SWP and dwell times for such potentials). Therefore, in order to better understand the properties of the average SWP clock times introduced in [28], it is necessary to analyze a situation in which they differ from the dwell time averaged over the corresponding sub-ensemble, such as for asymmetric potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%