1990
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average locus differences in mutability related to protein "class": a hypothesis.

Abstract: Substantially less genetic variation has been recognized in studies of the proteins of nucleated cells by the technique of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis than has been encountered in studies of serum transport proteins and erythrocyte enzymes with one-dimensional electrophoresis. Technical factors appear to account for only part of the difference. The two remaining (nonexclusive) explanations are more stringent biological selection against variants of these proteins or lower mutation rates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, mutations do not occur at random throughout the genome. Spontaneous germ-line nucleotide mutation rates in humans appear to vary between loci by a factor of at least 16 (12,21). There is also evidence for wide variation in humans in the rate of nucleotide substitutions induced by ethylnitrosourea (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifth, mutations do not occur at random throughout the genome. Spontaneous germ-line nucleotide mutation rates in humans appear to vary between loci by a factor of at least 16 (12,21). There is also evidence for wide variation in humans in the rate of nucleotide substitutions induced by ethylnitrosourea (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on studies of known variants in the two systems, we doubt that the failure to detect variants with 2-D PAGE under the conditions employed could account for more than a 10% difference between the two series (20). (iii) The mutability of the relatively small subset of proteins examined with 1-D electrophoresis might not be comparable to that of the larger number of proteins examined by 2-D PAGE (21). (iv) The approach assumes equal survival of mutations causing nucleotide substitutions in these somatic cells in culture and similar mutations in the human germ line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species analysed were taxonomically diverse, including two monocotyledons, one dicotyledon and one gymnosperm, making the results of probable general value. In addition to technical improvements (Rosenblum et a!., 1983;Damerval et a!., 1986), there would be at least three reasons for these relatively 'high' levels of polymorphism: (1) 2-D PAGE does not only reveal unit charge substitutions, but also other variations not detectable by 1-D PAGE (discussed by Neel, 1990); (2) in contrast with previous results (e.g. Singh & Coulthart, 1982), neither the insolubility nor the abundance of the polypeptides seem to be factors decreasing the variability, at least in maize (Damerval, 1994); (3) the majority of proteins revealed are not structural ones: partial sequencing of 36 major proteins excised from the gels has shown that most of the significant homologies are with enzymes (P. Touzet, in preparation).…”
Section: Amount Of Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that 2-DE could have a great potential for the study of genetic variability of populations, in that it allows a more representative sample of the genome to be analysed. However, studies of genetic variability in natural populations of animal species by means of 2-DE have been relatively scarce, because 2-DE is technically more difficult and time consuming than 1-DE and, furthermore, because the first results revealed substantially less genetic variation than had been estimated by 1-DE (Edwards and Hopkinson, 1980;Aquadro and Avise, 1981;Neel, 1990). Moreover, most studies have been focused on a few species (particularly man and Drosophila) so that the available information is to a large extent redundant and biased as a means of getting an appropriate view of the levels of genetic variability detected by 2-DE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%