2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982006000600009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação de características de qualidade da carne de suínos por meio de componentes principais

Abstract: Dados de 326 animais de uma população F2 de suínos foram utilizados para avaliar a redução da dimensionalidade do espaço multivariado por meio de componentes principais. Foram consideradas as seguintes características: pH aos 45 minutos e 24 horas post-mortem (pH45 e pHu, respectivamente), perda de peso por gotejamento (GOTEJ), perda de peso por cozimento (COZ), perda de peso total (PTOT), gordura intramuscular (GORINT), maciez objetiva (MACIEZ), luminosidade (L), índice de vermelho (a) e índice de amarelo (b)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower hardness value observed in the present study with the inclusion of FSM can be explained by the higher intramuscular fat in the meat of animals fed this ingredient, since deposits of this kind of fat represent 20 to 35% of total fat and can be modulated according to the diet. Intramuscular fat might make the meat softer because of its positive effect on meat juiciness and tenderness (Barbosa et al, 2006), explaining the best juiciness scores for cuts with the highest amount of this type of fat (Cannata et al, 2009). For hardness and overall acceptance, contrary to the results obtained in the present study, Tibbetts et al (1981) did not observe effects of the inclusion of fish silage in the diet on the softness, juiciness, taste, or acceptance of pig meat.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The lower hardness value observed in the present study with the inclusion of FSM can be explained by the higher intramuscular fat in the meat of animals fed this ingredient, since deposits of this kind of fat represent 20 to 35% of total fat and can be modulated according to the diet. Intramuscular fat might make the meat softer because of its positive effect on meat juiciness and tenderness (Barbosa et al, 2006), explaining the best juiciness scores for cuts with the highest amount of this type of fat (Cannata et al, 2009). For hardness and overall acceptance, contrary to the results obtained in the present study, Tibbetts et al (1981) did not observe effects of the inclusion of fish silage in the diet on the softness, juiciness, taste, or acceptance of pig meat.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandes et al (2016) did not find differences when evaluating the influence of the commercialization form on the chemical composition of the meat. (Table 3) and it showed similar averages to those found by Barbosa et al (2006) and like the ones attributed by Fox et al (1980) and Caldara et al (2012) for pork in PSE condition (< 5.8). The pH value of the meat influences protein denaturation, myofibrils distention and muscle cell shrinkage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, it is possible to discard the variables that few contribute to the discrimination of the data. The same model was used by Barbosa et al (2006) and Santos et al (2010) for the discard of variables. However, the purpose of our work was not to evaluate towards the discarding of variables, since it was not a large number of variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%