1970
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740210212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Availability of lysine in protein concentrates and diets using carpenter's method and a modified silcock method

Abstract: A comparison was made of methods for the evaluation of the available lysine in protein concentrates and diets. Some modifications of the Silcock method, developed by Roach et al. for lysine determination are suggested, and the optimum range of lysine concentration in samples has been evaluated.With animal protein concentrates, the Silcock method for measuring the total and residual lysine, after treatment with l-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, gave results in close agreement with those for available lysine obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workers mentioned above and Sasano, Yoshiwara & Oki (1968) all found reasonably good agreement between results obtained by the 'direct' and 'difference' procedures. The 'difference' procedure has been considered the method of choice, apart from the factor of convenience, and a reference against which to judge the 'direct' procedure (Ostrowski, Jones & Cadenhead, 1970;Booth, 1971;Milner & Westgarth, 1973). Looking back, we can see that all these workers who found general agreement had used either animal-protein samples (essentially carbohydrate-free) or vegetable materials that were either unprocessed or heated at relatively high temperatures (as in oilseed processing).…”
Section: Fdnb-reactive Lysine (Direct Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workers mentioned above and Sasano, Yoshiwara & Oki (1968) all found reasonably good agreement between results obtained by the 'direct' and 'difference' procedures. The 'difference' procedure has been considered the method of choice, apart from the factor of convenience, and a reference against which to judge the 'direct' procedure (Ostrowski, Jones & Cadenhead, 1970;Booth, 1971;Milner & Westgarth, 1973). Looking back, we can see that all these workers who found general agreement had used either animal-protein samples (essentially carbohydrate-free) or vegetable materials that were either unprocessed or heated at relatively high temperatures (as in oilseed processing).…”
Section: Fdnb-reactive Lysine (Direct Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrolysis of high molecular weight protein, and change of their conformation structure lead to a greater number of released e-amino groups of lysine or decreasing the tannin content of soaked legume seed flours, which are the potential of binding tannin to e-amino groups of lysine. The nutritive value of proteins could be directly related to the content of lysine in the protein molecule whose epsilon-amino group is free, while that with the bound epsilon group was said to have no nutritive value [40]. The relative large amounts of lysine in some legume proteins make it as a good supplement in some popular food mixture in Egypt [41].…”
Section: In-vitro Protein Digestibility and Available Lysinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methionine was determined by the Lorenzo-Andreu (1961) procedure and methionine availability by the method described by Pieniazek et al (1975)' total and available lysine as described by Ostrowski et al (1970) and tryptophan by using the procedure described by Matheson (1974). Tryptophan availability was determined using Tetruhymenu pyryformis according to Boyne et al (1975).…”
Section: Analyticalmentioning
confidence: 99%