Addition of 6 ,iM indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to incubation buffer increases the sensitivity of coleoptile sections cut from dark-grown Avena sativa L. cv. Lodi to red light by a factor of 10,000, relative to the response in the absence of added IAA, without changing the maximum amount of lightinduced growth. From 0.03 to 4 IuM IAA sections show at least a 100-fold increase in sensitivity to red light relative to the response in the absence of added IAA. In this IAA concentration range, the light-induced increase in elongation shows two phases of response to red-light fluence, which are separated by a plateau. The biphasic fluence-response curve is also characteristic of the red-light-induced stimulation of coleoptile growth in intact dark-grown seedlings. The effect of IAA on the sensitivity of the phytochrome-mediated growth response appears to be on some step in the transduction of the phytochrome signal, rather than on the growth response itself.Brief irradiation with red light stimulates coleoptile elongation and inhibits mesocotyl elongation in etiolated oat (Avena sativa) seedlings (1, 2). Phytochrome control of such photomorphogenetic growth responses in etiolated cereal seedlings has been studied extensively in whole plants (see ref. 1 for review). Consistent and reproducible results for red-light-induced growth responses have been obtained by performing experiments on intact etiolated oat seedlings grown and handled in complete darkness without the use of green "safelights" (1, 2).Auxins have long been thought to mediate the red-lightinduced changes in growth in etiolated cereal seedlings (3)(4)(5). Cut sections of etiolated tissue have been used to study the phytochrome/auxin interaction, but findings have been inconclusive. In one such study (3), it was reported that indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), a naturally occurring auxin, must be present in the incubation buffer for red-light-stimulated growth and reversal by far-red light to be seen. This finding has not been replicated in subsequent studies (4, 6).There have also been difficulties in comparing the response of sections to the responses to red light seen in intact plants. Studies of the fluence dependence of the red-lightinduced increase in growth in coleoptile sections cut from etiolated seedlings (4, 6) do not report the biphasic fluenceresponse curve characteristic of the whole tissue responses (1, 2). In one of these studies (6), only the less sensitive phase of the red-light response found in whole plants was reported. In another study (4), only the more sensitive phase of the red-light response was detected. The complete lack of the less sensitive response generally seen (1, 2, 6) is unique to this study (4). Neither of the studies of section growth responses to red light (4, 6) included comparable experiments with intact plants.To investigate some of the possibilities suggested by earlier studies, we have adapted the techniques of Mandoli and Briggs (1) for the study of oat coleoptile sections cut in the dark from seedlings grown in co...