Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Display
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-31397-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autostereoscopic, Partial Pixel, Spatially Multiplexed, and other 3D Display Technologies

Abstract: Abstract:The technologies and advances in the field of three-dimensional (3D) displays within the past two decades are reviewed. Specifically, the developments in diffractive, refractive, reflective and occlusive 3D display strategies are discussed, highlighting the advantages and limitations of the associated systems. The partial pixel and the partial object pixel architectures associated with autostereoscopic displays are discussed in some detail, while other techniques are briefly introduced. It is shown th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autostereoscopic 3-D displays exploits binocular stereopsis and provide different images for different perspective views without the need of users wearing special glasses, which can be categorized into two main types; viz., spatial-multiplexed and time-multiplexed types. [1][2][3] Most commercial products are the former one, which use a lenticular lens or parallax barrier as the component to divide the pixels on a flat-panel display into several groups, depending on the required number of perspective views. 4 Each group of pixels can be seen only from a specific viewing direction or virtual window at the viewing plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autostereoscopic 3-D displays exploits binocular stereopsis and provide different images for different perspective views without the need of users wearing special glasses, which can be categorized into two main types; viz., spatial-multiplexed and time-multiplexed types. [1][2][3] Most commercial products are the former one, which use a lenticular lens or parallax barrier as the component to divide the pixels on a flat-panel display into several groups, depending on the required number of perspective views. 4 Each group of pixels can be seen only from a specific viewing direction or virtual window at the viewing plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autostereoscopic displays are a kind of naked-eye three-dimensional display which show a different image to both eyes of the viewer without the need of users wearing glasses and exploits the binocular disparity of human vision for depth perception [1][2][3]. The technology for realizing this 3D concept can be classified into several types, namely spatially multiplexed, time multiplexed, eye tracking, etc., and the type to be chosen mainly depends on the temporal response of the image source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though updatable 3D holographic images have been demonstrated in photorefractive polymers through the two-beam interference with the assistance of a high voltage 2 3 , multiview stereoscopic approaches have to be implemented to compensate the limited viewing angle of each perspective image or hologram, which has micrometre-scale refractive-index modulations associated with the non-locality of the polymeric photorefractivity 8 . Removing the complexity, single-beam computer-generated holography 9 10 combined with the recent advance in metamaterials 4 and metasurfaces 5 6 has enabled write-once subwavelength-scale phase manipulations for 3D holographic images with the potential of wide viewing angles. In addition to the low resolution (less than 800 pixels in each direction) incapable of practical applications, however, the resonance nature in these metallic nanostructures inherently hampers the reconstruction of full-colour and polarization-dependent wavefronts of light 4 5 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%