“…Thus, competence refers to the way in which a person relates to and copes with everyday life effectively and confidently [ 12 ], while autonomy corresponds to the decisions that the person makes, and relatedness refers to the interpersonal relationships that the person establishes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. In this sense, we can affirm that such a theory alludes, therefore, to motivation and its types [ 15 ], understanding motivation as the engine that drives a person to undertake an action [ 16 ], and differentiating between intrinsic motivation (which corresponds to the enjoyment of the task itself, causing pleasure and psychological well-being) and extrinsic motivation (in which motivation comes from an external factor) [ 17 ]. Combining both ideas, we can establish the existence of a correspondence between the two (satisfaction of basic psychological needs and motivation) so that the greater the satisfaction of these needs, the more a person’s actions are considered to be produced by a person, i.e., by intrinsic motivation [ 18 ], and, conversely, the lower this satisfaction, the more a person’s actions are produced by extrinsic motivation [ 19 ].…”