2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomy and morality: A Self-Determination Theory discussion of ethics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, since this study is linked, in part, with students' emotions regarding OSS acceptance, SDT has been used to identify the external variables that complete the acceptance model. This theory is focused on identifying the reason behind an individual's autonomy in the development of any type of activity [45]. Indeed, the combination of the TAM and Self-Determination Theory has been widely used by the literature in recent years [46][47][48], and the compatibility of both has been robustly demonstrated [49].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, since this study is linked, in part, with students' emotions regarding OSS acceptance, SDT has been used to identify the external variables that complete the acceptance model. This theory is focused on identifying the reason behind an individual's autonomy in the development of any type of activity [45]. Indeed, the combination of the TAM and Self-Determination Theory has been widely used by the literature in recent years [46][47][48], and the compatibility of both has been robustly demonstrated [49].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to forced regulation by external agents, autonomy is related to regulation by the self [45]. It refers to the need to be autonomous [77], and, therefore, it pertains to those personal acts through which individuals control their own behavior.…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions, primarily social, are studied in their role as either facilitating or hindering human flourishing. The theory has a wealth of empirical evidence backing it, and has been used to interpret behaviors and motivational processes in many diverse fields of human endeavour, from education (Liu et al 2015;Jang et al 2010) and psychotherapy (Ryan and Deci 2008), to health care (Ng et al 2012), sport (Hagger and Chatzisarantis 2007), and ethics (Arvanitis 2017). By highlighting motivational processes, the theory succeeds in exploring and explaining personality growth, development and the way humans relate to one another, as well as to their environments.…”
Section: Self Determination Theory and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDT is useful for providing a basis for an empirical evaluation of the politics of recognition. SDT is clearly situated in Aristotelian (Ryan & Martela, 2016) and Kantian (Arvanitis, 2017) philosophy, and is an empirically validated 'necessary and sufficient' theory of human wellbeing (see Ryan & Deci, 2017 for an overview). Further, Ryan and Deci (2017) argue that SDT is not just a psychological theory but also a political one.…”
Section: Group Need Satisfaction Scalementioning
confidence: 99%