2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15503-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Multi-sensor Vehicle Classification for Traffic Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1provides a comparative overview of the influence of weather conditions by sensor type. Recently, multi-sensor-based traffic monitoring systems have begun to gain more traction [28], [29], [33]- [35]. The primary motivation behind this trend is to improve detection accuracy and mitigate the shortcomings in complex, changing environments and weather conditions [30]- [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1provides a comparative overview of the influence of weather conditions by sensor type. Recently, multi-sensor-based traffic monitoring systems have begun to gain more traction [28], [29], [33]- [35]. The primary motivation behind this trend is to improve detection accuracy and mitigate the shortcomings in complex, changing environments and weather conditions [30]- [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (c)) to accumulate on the lens or sensor, affecting image clarity or suffering from clipping, and reducing detail in overexposed situations, increasing the amount of incorrect classifications, as well as the number of false negatives. Previous works have shown that combining multiple sensors can be effective [28]- [31]. A recent work published by researchers at Guilin University of Electronic Technology [32] showed promising results.…”
Section: Hardware Comparison -Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, we design two scenarios (static and dynamic) in this work to install a RF receiver either close to the road or inside the car to aggregate the emitted RF signals from the vehicles. In this work, we evaluate the recognition performance in both static and dynamic scenarios and discuss more about the three classification methods [5]: naive Bayes [6][7][8][9], decision tree [10][11][12] and k-nearest-neighbor [6,[13][14][15], to show the differences (advantage and disadvantage) of various classification algorithms in reality of traffic monitoring. As implemented, these classification methods are applied on the aggregated signal in the computer attached to the RF receiver to classify the traffic situation in both scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%