Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives

François, Mathilde; Osiurak, François; Fort, Alexandra; Crave, Philippe; Navarro, Jordan

doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1188218

Cited by 57 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With participative involvement (design by users), users participate in three steps of the HMI design process with a direct and active contribution to the concept design phase [60]. This type of user involvement helps to improve the efficacy of the HMI by accessing drivers' tacit knowledge and considering their mental models and preferences [25].…”

Section: User-centered Design Of Automotive Hmimentioning

confidence: 99%

AmbientBreath

Lee¹,

Elhaouij²,

Picard³

2021

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To promote calm breathing inside a car, we designed a just-in-time breathing intervention stimulated by multi-sensory feedback and evaluated its efficacy in a driving simulator. Efficacy was measured via reduction in breathing rate as well as by user acceptance and driving safety measures. Drivers were first exposed to demonstrations of three kinds of ambient feedback designed to stimulate a goal breathing rate: (1) auditory (rhythmic background noise), (2) synchronized modulation of wind (dashboard fans modulating air pointed toward the driver) together with auditory, or (3) synchronized visual (ambient lights) together with auditory. After choosing one preference from these three, each driver engaged in a challenging driving task in a car simulator, where the ambient stimulation was triggered when their breathing exceeded a goal rate adapted to their personal baseline. Two user studies were conducted in a car simulator involving respectively 23 and 31 participants. The studies include both manual and autonomous driving scenarios to evaluate drivers' engagement in the intervention under different cognitive loads. The most frequently selected stimulation was the combined auditory and wind modalities. Measures of changes in breathing rate show that the participants were able to successfully engage in the breathing intervention; however, several factors from the driving context appear to have an impact on when the intervention is or is not effective.

show abstract

Section: User-centered Design Of Automotive Hmimentioning

confidence: 99%

AmbientBreath

Lee¹,

Elhaouij²,

Picard³

2021

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Performance and acceptance of novel human-machine systems have been found to be positively influenced by the presence of end-user input in analysis and design (e.g., Francois et al 2017). End users have unique insights into the realities and potentialities of system performance that nonexperts are often unable to detect.…”

Section: Assemble Cross-functional Analysis Teammentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidance on Including Social, Organizational and Technical Influences in Nuclear Utility and Plant Modernization Plans

Hettinger¹,

Dainoff²,

Hanes³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this report is to provide the nuclear power industry with guidance on including socio-technical issues in plans developed for current and future modernization efforts. Socio-technical issues of concern include social, organizational, and related technical aspects of modernized systems. These can be addressed using a set of systematic analysis and design methods developed to address socio-technical issues of the sort facing the nuclear power industry. The next phase of this work will involve developing and implementing a modernization plan that includes socio-technical tools and methods identified and discussed in a report by Dainoff and colleagues (2020). The plan is expected to be developed and implemented in cooperation with a nuclear utility that has expressed interest in participating. The Dainoff et al. report provides the foundation for the present effort and presents a methodological tool set for analyzing socio-technical issues applicable to many modernization efforts. The tools described by Dainoff et al. are based on principles of human factors engineering, safety engineering, and systems engineering and are discussed within the specific context of nuclear utility modernization and transformation efforts. It is expected that the plan and the concepts described in the current report will be developed and implemented with a nuclear utility partner. The plan developed with the nuclear utility partner will have a substantially higher level of detail than the guidance provided in this report, particularly with regard to details of plan logistics, etc.

show abstract

“…To counter this phenomenon, a human-centered design has been proposed ( Billings, 1991 ). This design process widely used in a variety of domains ( François et al, 2016 ) is based on the rationale that tool designers should take into account as much as possible users’ logic and characteristics during the tool design process. In a way, the consideration of the user in the design process aims at reducing the distance between the maker and the user.…”

Section: The Present: Sophisticated Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Our Cognition Shapes and Is Shaped by Technology: A Common Framework for Understanding Human Tool-Use Interactions in the Past, Present, and Future

2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the evolution, humans have constantly developed and improved their technologies. This evolution began with the use of physical tools, those tools that increase our sensorimotor abilities (e.g., first stone tools, modern knives, hammers, pencils). Although we still use some of these tools, we also employ in daily life more sophisticated tools for which we do not systematically understand the underlying physical principles (e.g., computers, cars). Current research is also turned toward the development of brain–computer interfaces directly linking our brain activity to machines (i.e., symbiotic tools). The ultimate goal of research on this topic is to identify the key cognitive processes involved in these different modes of interaction. As a primary step to fulfill this goal, we offer a first attempt at a common framework, based on the idea that humans shape technologies, which also shape us in return. The framework proposed is organized into three levels, describing how we interact when using physical (Past), sophisticated (Present), and symbiotic (Future) technologies. Here we emphasize the role played by technical reasoning and practical reasoning, two key cognitive processes that could nevertheless be progressively suppressed by the proficient use of sophisticated and symbiotic tools. We hope that this framework will provide a common ground for researchers interested in the cognitive basis of human tool-use interactions, from paleoanthropology to neuroergonomics.

show abstract

Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives

Cited by 57 publications

References 78 publications

AmbientBreath

AmbientBreath

Guidance on Including Social, Organizational and Technical Influences in Nuclear Utility and Plant Modernization Plans

How Our Cognition Shapes and Is Shaped by Technology: A Common Framework for Understanding Human Tool-Use Interactions in the Past, Present, and Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About