2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Sleep Spindle Detection and Genetic Influence Estimation Using Continuous Wavelet Transform

Abstract: Mounting evidence for the role of sleep spindles in neuroplasticity has led to an increased interest in these non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep oscillations. It has been hypothesized that fast and slow spindles might play a different role in memory processing. Here, we present a new sleep spindle detection algorithm utilizing a continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and individual adjustment of slow and fast spindle frequency ranges. Eighteen nap recordings of ten subjects were used for algorithm validation. Our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scoring Variability in Sleep Staging may be visually uncertain, that, in the absence of quantitative measurements, it is difficult to score them with certainty. There are numerous algorithms for detecting spindles [18][19][20] that can reduce these disagreements if incorporated as a prescoring module. For example, the events marked as "spindles?"…”
Section: Potential Approaches To Mitigate Inter-scorer Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring Variability in Sleep Staging may be visually uncertain, that, in the absence of quantitative measurements, it is difficult to score them with certainty. There are numerous algorithms for detecting spindles [18][19][20] that can reduce these disagreements if incorporated as a prescoring module. For example, the events marked as "spindles?"…”
Section: Potential Approaches To Mitigate Inter-scorer Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step for automatic SS and HVS detection during the 1 hr of NREM or REM sleep for each rat and experimental group was to filter the EEG signals using the 11–17 Hz band pass filter for SS, or the 4.1–10 Hz band pass filter for HVS. Then, we applied the continuous wavelet transform with the mother wavelet “cmorl‐2’’ MATLAB R2011a function, providing a complex Morlet wavelet with a determined central frequency f 0 = 2 (Adamczyk, Genzel, Dresler, Steiger, & Friess, ; Ciric et al, ). In addition, all the SS had a minimal duration of 0.5 s, whereas all the HVS had a minimal duration of 1 s. However, because we automatically detected many false positive or negative SS or HVS, we had to visually correct all the automatically detected SS or HVS for their final extraction from each NREM/REM sleep episode of each rat and each experimental group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the first step for automatic SS detection during REM sleep was to concatenate all the extracted 10 s epochs of REM sleep from motor cortex for each rat, each experimental group, and then to filter the EEG signals using the 11 -17 Hz band pass filter. Then, we applied the Continuous Wavelet Transform with the mother wavelet "cmorl-2" MATLAB R2011a function, providing a complex Morlet wavelet with determined central frequency f 0 = 2 [27]. In addition, all SS had a minimal duration of 0.5 s.…”
Section: Sleep Recording and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%