2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic retrieval of current evidence to support update of bibliography in clinical guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cases where there are a lot of results, the goal articles have a very high chance to get lost outside of the top of the ranking. This reinforces the findings of (Iruetaguena, et al, 2013), who noted similar results. This indicates that the combination of the Rosenfeld-Shiffman filter combined with tf-idf is perhaps not a suitable way to process large numbers of articles, as the resulting ratings are very close to each other for many articles.…”
Section: Results For Rankingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the cases where there are a lot of results, the goal articles have a very high chance to get lost outside of the top of the ranking. This reinforces the findings of (Iruetaguena, et al, 2013), who noted similar results. This indicates that the combination of the Rosenfeld-Shiffman filter combined with tf-idf is perhaps not a suitable way to process large numbers of articles, as the resulting ratings are very close to each other for many articles.…”
Section: Results For Rankingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Cohen et al (2012) show some success in identifying goal articles with a machine learning approach, but this approach requires a large manually annotated dataset, which is very labor-intensive. Iruetaguena et al(2013) were able to find these articles, but their result set was too large, and their rating and filtering proved insufficient to filter out goal articles to the top of their ranking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations