2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting New Evidence for Evidence-Based Guidelines Using a Semantic Distance Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Hu et al, 2015), we propose a semantic distance measure to rank terms for finding relevant evidence from a Biomedical search engine such as PubMed. Our semantic distance measure is based on the (widely shared) assumption that more frequently co-occurring terms are more semantically related.…”
Section: Present the Best Results To The Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In (Hu et al, 2015), we propose a semantic distance measure to rank terms for finding relevant evidence from a Biomedical search engine such as PubMed. Our semantic distance measure is based on the (widely shared) assumption that more frequently co-occurring terms are more semantically related.…”
Section: Present the Best Results To The Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Hu et al, 2015), we have reported several experiments to evaluate the above approach. We selected the Dutch breast cancer guideline (version 1.0, 2004) (NABON, 2004) and the Dutch breast cancer guideline (version 2.0, 2012) (NABON, 2012) as the test data.…”
Section: Present the Best Results To The Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations