The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2784394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Pearl Classification Machine Based on a Multistream Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As concluded from Table 3 , when the p value increases to 0.09 and 0.12, the accuracy of network prediction will decline to a very low level; however, the prediction accuracy of MS-CNN model constructed in this study can reach 96% when the p value is 0.12; the prediction accuracy drops by only 3.3% compared with the prediction accuracy when the labels are correct, which indicates that the MS-CNN model constructed in this study effectively reduces the negative impact of commodity image labeling errors and effectively improves the robustness of CIR, which is consistent with the research results of Xuan et al (2017) [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As concluded from Table 3 , when the p value increases to 0.09 and 0.12, the accuracy of network prediction will decline to a very low level; however, the prediction accuracy of MS-CNN model constructed in this study can reach 96% when the p value is 0.12; the prediction accuracy drops by only 3.3% compared with the prediction accuracy when the labels are correct, which indicates that the MS-CNN model constructed in this study effectively reduces the negative impact of commodity image labeling errors and effectively improves the robustness of CIR, which is consistent with the research results of Xuan et al (2017) [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Extensive reviews can be found in work of Kadlec [2]. Among these methods, multivariate static techniques [3][4][5][6] have been widely used. However, these algorithms are relatively sensitive to measurement noise and commonly require a large number of samples to build the promising so sensor as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a situation, it is not suitable to directly apply SPC methods to flooding prognosis. Recent popular deep‐learning methods, such as deep brief networks , and convolutional neural networks , , often require a large amount of labeled data, which may not be directly applied to flooding prognosis. Recently, a degree of steadiness (DOS)‐based flooding prognosis strategy was proposed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%