2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic microcalcification and cluster detection for digital and digitised mammograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also performed benign/ malignant classification. Oliver et al [16] extracted image features with a bank of filters, and a boosting method is used to separate MC from non-MC. The dataset they used included the MIAS dataset (322 mammograms) and another 280 FFDM mammograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also performed benign/ malignant classification. Oliver et al [16] extracted image features with a bank of filters, and a boosting method is used to separate MC from non-MC. The dataset they used included the MIAS dataset (322 mammograms) and another 280 FFDM mammograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Enlarged view of the microcalcification part of a outlined with a red rectangle lower specificity (87.77 %). In the work of Oliver et al [16], the individual microcalcification detection is based on local image features of the microcalcifications from a bank of filters. A pixel-based boosting classifier is then trained, and salient features were selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, diverse Adaboost support vector machine (SVM) was used as second level classifier. Oliver et al [16] detected the MCs based on extracting local features for characterizing the morphology of the MCs. The developed approach automatically learns and selects the most salient features.…”
Section: Mcs Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, most of the techniques focus on two types of breast cancer: microcalcifications and masses [20]. Oliver et al [35] presented a knowledge-based approach for automatic detection of microcalcifications and clusters in mammographic images by using local features extracted from a bank of filters to obtain a local description of the microcalcifications morphology. Kabbadj et al [25] also presented a novel approach to detect microcalcifications on digitized mammograms using shape features, fuzzy logic, and SVM.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shanthi and Bhaskaran [41] proposed an integrated methodology of intuitionistic fuzzy C-means clustering, discrete wavelet feature extraction technique, and a self-adaptive resource allocation network classifier for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer in mammogram images. Oliveira et al [35] developed content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system in support with the classification of breast tissue density which can be used in the processing chain for lesion segmentation and classification.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%