Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0207(20010228)50:6<1331::aid-nme46>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic mesh refinement in limit analysis

Abstract: A strategy for automatic mesh refinement in limit analysis is combined with a recently developed computational method. In the absence of estimates of the local error the strategy can be based on the deformations and on slack in the yield condition. The approach is tested on standard problems in plane strain, including the classical punch problem. Very accurate results are obtained with the use of moderate computational power. This way we obtain new and improved results for classical problems in limit analysis.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when FEM is applied some of the well-known characteristics of mesh-based methods can lead to problems: the solutions are often highly sensitive to the geometry of the original mesh, particularly in the region of stress or displacement/velocity singularities; furthermore, volumetric locking may occur in plane strain and 3D problems [11]. Although adaptive schemes with the h-version [12][13][14][15][16] or p-version FEM [17,18] have been used to try to overcome such disadvantages, and show immense promise, the schemes quickly become complex and a large number of elements are generally required to obtain accurate solutions. On the other hand, the objective function in the associated optimization problem is convex, but not everywhere differentiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when FEM is applied some of the well-known characteristics of mesh-based methods can lead to problems: the solutions are often highly sensitive to the geometry of the original mesh, particularly in the region of stress or displacement/velocity singularities; furthermore, volumetric locking may occur in plane strain and 3D problems [11]. Although adaptive schemes with the h-version [12][13][14][15][16] or p-version FEM [17,18] have been used to try to overcome such disadvantages, and show immense promise, the schemes quickly become complex and a large number of elements are generally required to obtain accurate solutions. On the other hand, the objective function in the associated optimization problem is convex, but not everywhere differentiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bo = B bo ; (11) where A bo is the coe cient matrix and B bo is the vector of speci ed values of stresses along the boundary.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adaptive procedure has been proposed for the nite-element limit analysis [10][11][12][13][14][15] as well as the mesh-free limit analysis [16] approaches. The main policy in these methods is de ning a posteriori error estimator and establishing an adaptive re nement strategy based on the reduction of this error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was introduced to illustrate locking phenomena by Nagtegaal et al [54] and became a popular benchmark test for plastic analysis procedures, particularly for rigid-plastic limit analysis [2,3,5,55,56]. The test problem consists of a rectangular specimen with two external thin symmetric cuts under in-plane tensile stresses τ 0 , as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Double Notched Tensile Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%