2010
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cell‐based smoothed finite element method for kinematic limit analysis

Abstract: Published paperLe, Canh V., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Askes, H., Bordas , Stéphane P. A., Rabczuk, T. and Nguyen-Vinh, H. (2010) SUMMARYThis paper presents a new numerical procedure for kinematic limit analysis problems, which incorporates the cell-based smoothed finite element method (CS-FEM) with second-order cone programming. The application of a strain smoothing technique to the standard displacement finite element both rules out volumetric locking and also results in an efficient method that can provide accurate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the interest of scientists in numerical limit analysis [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] has been resurged, principally thanks to the rapid development of efficient optimization algorithms and the continuous improvement in computer facilities. Current research is focusing on developing numerical limit analysis tools which are efficient and robust for the practice usage of engineers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the interest of scientists in numerical limit analysis [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] has been resurged, principally thanks to the rapid development of efficient optimization algorithms and the continuous improvement in computer facilities. Current research is focusing on developing numerical limit analysis tools which are efficient and robust for the practice usage of engineers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years efforts have focussed principally on the development of efficient and robust numerical limit analysis tools of potential use to engineers working in practice, which either use continuous (e.g. using finite element [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] or meshless [8][9][10] methods), semi-continuous [11] or truly discontinuous [12] representations of the relevant field variables. However, the accuracy of numerical limit analysis solutions is highly affected by local singularities arising from localized plastic deformations [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 . 142 with 200 nodal divisions) improves on existing FELA upper-bound solutions in the literature (Sloan & Kleeman, 1995;da Silva & Antao, 2007;Makrodimopoulos & Martin, 2007), and is also better than the approximate rather than strict upper-bound solution recently obtained by Le et al (2010) using a cell-based, smoothed, finite-element procedure. Furthermore, extrapolated solutions are in both cases very close to the exact solution.…”
Section: S Lcmentioning
confidence: 62%