Proceedings of the 9th International Natural Language Generation Conference 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w16-6610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic label generation for news comment clusters

Abstract: We present a supervised approach to automatically labelling topic clusters of reader comments to online news. We use a feature set that includes both features capturing properties local to the cluster and features that capture aspects from the news article and from comments outside the cluster. We evaluate the approach in an automatic and a manual, task-based setting. Both evaluations show the approach to outperform a baseline method, which uses tf*idf to select comment-internal terms for use as topic labels. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade, some research has been directed at the summarization of forum threads Hovy 2005, 2006;Tigelaar, op den Akker, and Hiemstra 2010). The majority of the recent work addressed summarization of comment threads on news websites (Ren et al 2011;Llewellyn, Grover, and Oberlander 2014;Giannakopoulos et al 2015;Kabadjov et al 2015;Aker et al 2016;Barker et al 2016). In the past decade, abstractive summarization techniques have been successfully applied to tasks related to discussion thread summarization, such as summarizing email threads (Zajic, Dorr, and Lin 2008), summarizing spoken and written conversations and meetings Oya et al 2014), and Twitter topic summarization (Zhang et al 2013).…”
Section: Summarization For Discussion Forum Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, some research has been directed at the summarization of forum threads Hovy 2005, 2006;Tigelaar, op den Akker, and Hiemstra 2010). The majority of the recent work addressed summarization of comment threads on news websites (Ren et al 2011;Llewellyn, Grover, and Oberlander 2014;Giannakopoulos et al 2015;Kabadjov et al 2015;Aker et al 2016;Barker et al 2016). In the past decade, abstractive summarization techniques have been successfully applied to tasks related to discussion thread summarization, such as summarizing email threads (Zajic, Dorr, and Lin 2008), summarizing spoken and written conversations and meetings Oya et al 2014), and Twitter topic summarization (Zhang et al 2013).…”
Section: Summarization For Discussion Forum Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than restricting our analysis to the system's output, truly assessing whether an NLG system is producing relevant personalized output necessitates extrinsic, task-based evaluations involving users. Such methods have long been used in the evaluation of automated summarization systems (Hand, 1997;He et al, 1999;Mani, 2001;McKeown et al, 2005) as well as NLG systems (Mellish and Dale, 1998;Reiter et al, 2001;Colineau et al, 2002), though we note that recent years have seen somewhat less of this sort of ecologically valid evaluation, and much more focus on statistical evaluation; the work of Barker et al (2016) and Newman et al (2020) represent examples of very welcome exceptions to this trend.…”
Section: Architectures For Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…e goal of DTS is to select the most relevant reply posts in a discussion thread and merge them to form a concise thread summary. Most of the current work focused on comment threads summarization on news websites [48][49][50][51][52][53]. Previous research studies have effectively attempted abstractive summarization (AS) techniques for the task of DTS, such as e-mail threads summarization [3], summarizing written and spoken chats/conversations and meeting recordings [4], and summarizing Twitter topic [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%