2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13534-014-0129-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic extraction of vertebral endplates from scoliotic radiographs using customized filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the reliabilities of computer-aided methods [ 5 , 6 , 8 ] were less than 3° for the Cobb angle measurements. For the model radiographs, the results of the proposed method are comparable to those reported in previous studies (i.e., ≤3°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, the reliabilities of computer-aided methods [ 5 , 6 , 8 ] were less than 3° for the Cobb angle measurements. For the model radiographs, the results of the proposed method are comparable to those reported in previous studies (i.e., ≤3°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also investigated the applicability of their method to the X-ray image of a human spine, and they believed that their method could be a good solution for low-quality human X-ray images. Anitha et al [ 8 ] proposed an automated system that extracted vertebral endplates using a customized filter that combined anisotropic, sigmoid, and differential filters. Samuvel et al [ 9 ] proposed a mask-based segmentation algorithm for automatic Cobb angle measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the segmentation-based method cannot provide the slope of the vertebra since it requires highly accurate boundary segmentation. The segmentation-based methods require additional edge detection method such as hough transform [2], [3] to identify the vertebral endplates. On the other hand, the proposed method shown in Fig.…”
Section: G Comparison Between the Proposed Methods And Segmentation-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be divided roughly into two categories: segmentation-based methods and direct estimation methods. Segmentation-based methods use an active contour model [1], customized filter [2], and charged-particle models [26] for vertebral segmentation to calculate the Cobb angle. Unfortunately, these methods are not robust because an accurate segmentation of the vertebra is extremely difficult owing to an unclear vertebral boundary in the radiographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alguns autores [27][28][29] descreveram metodologias utilizando computador e formulações geométricas sofisticadas para estimar a rotação vertebral a partir de imagens de raio X no plano frontal. Observa-se que a intenção é registrar o objeto de reconstrução (isto é, a coluna vertebral) por dois diferentes ângulos.…”
Section: Rotação Vertebralunclassified