2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of drowsiness using in-ear EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this initial proof-of-concept stage, Alqurashi et al [13] conducted comprehensive multiple daytime nap recordings to establish the degree of matching of the corresponding sleep latencies based on ear-EEG and scalp-EEG under two conditions: 1) after normal sleep and 2) after sleep restriction. The same nap data over twenty three participants were used by Nakamura et al [14] to establish the potential of ear-EEG in automatic detection of drowsiness (i.e. to distinguish between wakefulness and light sleep).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After this initial proof-of-concept stage, Alqurashi et al [13] conducted comprehensive multiple daytime nap recordings to establish the degree of matching of the corresponding sleep latencies based on ear-EEG and scalp-EEG under two conditions: 1) after normal sleep and 2) after sleep restriction. The same nap data over twenty three participants were used by Nakamura et al [14] to establish the potential of ear-EEG in automatic detection of drowsiness (i.e. to distinguish between wakefulness and light sleep).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al [15] conducted overnight sleep recordings over eight participants to evaluate their in-ear sensing system; their sensors were able to record the EEG, EOG, and EMG, key physiological variables for sleep monitoring. It is important to highlight that the sleep studies in [11][12][13][14][15], together with this study, were conducted using one-size-fits-all viscoelastic in-ear sensors, which are not optimised for a particular user but are convenient for wide deployment and promise an affordable out-of-clinic solution. Owing to their flexibility and favourable stress-strain properties (memory foam) [28], these viscoelastic earpieces can be squeezed and shaped up to fit comfortably any ear; such a 'generic' in-ear sensor is readily applicable to a large population, a pre-requisite for the future eHealth in the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first research on the “in-the-ear recording concept” was published in 2012 [ 9 ], the BCI application of in-ear EEG signals has been investigated using the external stimuli such as visual or auditory cues [ 11 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] or independently of external stimuli [ 24 , 25 ]. Compared with the performance of the previous studies on the BCI application of in-ear EEG signals to mental state monitoring, our performance using the ESN technique is higher than theirs: Previous studies successfully have detected drowsiness [ 24 , 25 ], mental workload during visuomotor tracking task [ 26 ], and emotional states [ 27 ] but have required long time window (more than 10 s) to achieve high classification accuracy ( Table 5 ). In this study, we suggest that the attention monitoring system using in-ear EEG and the ESN is much faster to classify mental states than previous studies, within every 0.5 s with high accuracy of 81.16% when using one run as the test set and remaining runs as the training set within each subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study has reported that drowsiness during driving simulations can be recognized from in-ear EEG signals with approximately 85% accuracy over 10 s epochs and 98.5% over 230 s epochs [ 24 ]. A similar study to measure day time drowsiness reported that in-ear EEG signals during 30 s epochs of drowsiness were discriminated from 30 s epochs of wakefulness with 80% accuracy [ 25 ]. Another study reported that mental workload and motor action during a visuomotor tracking task were detected using a two-channel in-ear EEG system with 68.55% accuracy in 5 s windows and 78.51% accuracy when a moving average filter was applied over five such windows [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generic reusable earpieces, however, are indispensable for commercializing the in-ear EEG system that all users can use immediately in real life. Several kinds of generic earpieces are developed by using memory foam with Ag-coated cloth (Goverdovsky et al, 2016, Goverdovsky et al, 2017Nakamura et al, 2018), Ag spray-coated polycarbonate (Kaveh et al, 2020), CNT/PDMS-based canaltype ear electrode cap (CEE) (Lee et al, 2014), and silvered glass silicone CEE (Dong et al, 2016). Viscoelastic flexibility and pressure between earpiece materials and ear canal allow a device to be held more softly and firmly, reducing both motion artifacts and user discomfort.…”
Section: Methods To Reduce In-ear Electroencephalography Motion Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%