2020
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10060321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Ear EEG Based Attention State Classification Using Echo State Network

Abstract: It is important to maintain attention when carrying out significant daily-life tasks that require high levels of safety and efficiency. Since degradation of attention can sometimes have dire consequences, various brain activity measurement devices such as electroencephalography (EEG) systems have been used to monitor attention states in individuals. However, conventional EEG instruments have limited utility in daily life because they are uncomfortable to wear. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the performance of previous studies on the EEG application of attention state monitoring (Chen et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Gaume et al, 2019;Jeong and Jeong, 2020), we dealt with the recognition up to four levels of attention states and our performance is higher than them using Complexity-XGBoost (see Table 3). The Complexity-XGBoost achieved the accuracy of 81.39 ± 1.47% for four-level attention states (HA, MA, LA, and RS), 80.42 ± 0.84% for three-level attention states (HA, MA, and LA), and 95.36 ± 2.31% for two-level attention states (AS and RS) when using 5-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compared with the performance of previous studies on the EEG application of attention state monitoring (Chen et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Gaume et al, 2019;Jeong and Jeong, 2020), we dealt with the recognition up to four levels of attention states and our performance is higher than them using Complexity-XGBoost (see Table 3). The Complexity-XGBoost achieved the accuracy of 81.39 ± 1.47% for four-level attention states (HA, MA, LA, and RS), 80.42 ± 0.84% for three-level attention states (HA, MA, and LA), and 95.36 ± 2.31% for two-level attention states (AS and RS) when using 5-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Before this project, OpenBCI ear-based sensing systems had to be individually conceived and assembled with substantial engineering efforts (see, e.g. [11] , [12] , [13] ). Also, the cEEGrid sensors were only usable by designing adapters for expensive EEG amplifiers or purchasing a more expensive commercial analog (e.g., the MBT Smarting Mobi).…”
Section: Hardware In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG signal provides reliable markers of attention states; such as fluctuations in the cortical alpha rhythm that mirror attentional fluctuations ( Fiedler et al, 2017 ; Jeong and Jeong, 2020 ). The ear-EEG system gives subjects the opportunity to move freely and wear the device for long periods of time.…”
Section: Combining Tavns and In-ear Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%