Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2494091.2495988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic correction of annotation boundaries in activity datasets by class separation maximization

Abstract: It is challenging to precisely identify the boundary of activities in order to annotate the activity datasets required to train activity recognition systems. This is the case for experts, as well as non-experts who may be recruited for crowd-sourcing paradigms to reduce the annotation effort or speed up the process by distributing the task over multiple annotators. We present a method to automatically adjust annotation boundaries, presuming a correct annotation label, but imprecise boundaries, otherwise known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These labels are used for training a machine learning classifier [some issues related to ground truth annotation have been addressed in Ref. ( 48 , 60 ); automated vision-based annotation systems have also been explored in Ref. ( 59 , 61 )].…”
Section: Automated Movement Recognition For Clinical Movement Assessmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These labels are used for training a machine learning classifier [some issues related to ground truth annotation have been addressed in Ref. ( 48 , 60 ); automated vision-based annotation systems have also been explored in Ref. ( 59 , 61 )].…”
Section: Automated Movement Recognition For Clinical Movement Assessmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users are assumed to only reflect their mood in the predetermined time intervals regardless of the tolerated delay; any potential mood change during the delay period should be accounted by users for the subsequent time interval. More advanced techniques such as [22] for automatic annotation correction can also be deployed at this stage.…”
Section: B Data Pre-processing and Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the temporal label uncertainty problem occurs when the time stamps associated with event labels are noisy or uncertain. The segmentation boundary uncertainty problem occurs when there is noise or uncertainty associated with the start and end time stamps of activity sessions [15, 9]. Approaches to these problems are not well matched to our setting as in our case the field labels provided by utox assessment are only available at a daily resolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%