1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00218-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic construction of FCMs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Source: Kok (2009: 125) In terms of limitations, and in accordance with Schneider et al (1998) and Özesmi, U. and Özesmi, S. (2004), decision-makers' ignorance and misconceptions are also coded in the maps. Additionally: (1) the problem can be modeled as FCM but this does not guarantee its resolution; (2) the map may not be able to model the occurrence of multiple causes; (3) the FCMs do not provide the actual value, but estimates of parameters or inferential statistical tests; and (4) FCMs are not clear as far as the concept of time is concerned.…”
Section: Fig 2 Fcm Stabilization and Value Convergence Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: Kok (2009: 125) In terms of limitations, and in accordance with Schneider et al (1998) and Özesmi, U. and Özesmi, S. (2004), decision-makers' ignorance and misconceptions are also coded in the maps. Additionally: (1) the problem can be modeled as FCM but this does not guarantee its resolution; (2) the map may not be able to model the occurrence of multiple causes; (3) the FCMs do not provide the actual value, but estimates of parameters or inferential statistical tests; and (4) FCMs are not clear as far as the concept of time is concerned.…”
Section: Fig 2 Fcm Stabilization and Value Convergence Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks of FCMs are: (i) the respondents' fallacies as misconceptions and biases get encoded in the maps (Özesmi and Özesmi 2004); (ii) FCM simulated results are relative and not real-value parameter estimates (Kim and Lee 1998;Özesmi and Özesmi 2004); (iii) they do not yield data with respect to a timeframe (Schneider et al 1998;Özesmi and Özesmi 2004); and (iv) require a large amount of post-processing time (Diniz et al 2015).…”
Section: Why Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu (1999) proposed census FCMs (CFCMs) for decision support in geographic information systems (GIS) and generated a CFCM using real census data, human expert knowledge, and quantitative data as a map in GIS. Schneider, Shnaider, Kandel, & Chew (1998) summarized two drawbacks of conventional FCMs: (1) the lack of a time concept in causal relationships; and (2) concurrency, which requires the simultaneous evaluation of node values in multiple concept nodes. To incorporate the time delay in FCMs, Park & Kim (1995) proposed fuzzy time cognitive maps (FTCM), in which a relationship is allowed to be attached with time delays.…”
Section: Fuzzy Cognitive Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagiwara's (1992) (2003) introduced a decomposition theory for FCMs, proposing a framework for calculating and simplifying causal inference patterns in complicated real-world applications. Schneider, Shnaider, Kandel, & Chew (1998) described a method for automatically constructing FCMs based on user-provided data. This method consists of finding the degree of similarity between any two variables (represented by numerical vectors), finding whether the relationship between the variables is direct or inverse, and using the fuzzy expert system tool (FEST) to determine the causality among the variables.…”
Section: Fuzzy Cognitive Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%