2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2001.941166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of QAM signals by neural networks

Abstract: In this paper, automatic classification of QAM signals including 64-state QAM and 256state QAM is discussed Three layer neural networks whose input data is the histogram distribution of instantaneous amplitude at symbol points is used for the classification. The evaluations of classdication performance are canid out for both cases in which the synchronization of symbol timing is assured at the receiver and not assured Good classification results are obtained by the computer simulations at SNR2lodB. The influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] proposed an algorithm in identification of digital modulation types (QAM, PSK and FSK) using the wavelet transform. Meanwhile, the authors in [4,15] proposed to classify different modulation models within the same modulation type. [4] proposed the algorithm which is used to distinguish the models between BPSK and QPSK, while the authors in [15] applied the neural network algorithm on the classification of 16, 64 and 256-QAM.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3] proposed an algorithm in identification of digital modulation types (QAM, PSK and FSK) using the wavelet transform. Meanwhile, the authors in [4,15] proposed to classify different modulation models within the same modulation type. [4] proposed the algorithm which is used to distinguish the models between BPSK and QPSK, while the authors in [15] applied the neural network algorithm on the classification of 16, 64 and 256-QAM.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the authors in [4,15] proposed to classify different modulation models within the same modulation type. [4] proposed the algorithm which is used to distinguish the models between BPSK and QPSK, while the authors in [15] applied the neural network algorithm on the classification of 16, 64 and 256-QAM. In [2], the authors proposed an algorithm for multi-models classification between M-PSK, M-FSK, M-ASK.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, in Taira [13], the histogram distribution of instantaneous amplitude at symbol points was used for the automatic classification of digitally quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signals including 64-state QAM and 256-state QAM. The author obtained good classification results by computer simulations at SNR greater or equal to 10 dB.…”
Section: Review Of Selected Digital Modulated Signals Recognition Algmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first family of AMR classifier developed are those that were designed to recognize only analog modulated signals [2,[5][6][7][8][9]. The classifier in the second family are those that are developed to recognise only digital modulated signals [10][11][12][13][14][15] while the third family of the AMR classifier are those that are designed to recognise or classify some joint analog and digital modulated signals [16][17][18]. These few selected algorithms: [2,[5][6][7][8][9], [10][11][12][13][14][15] and [16][17][18] for first, second and third families of AMR are briefly reviewed in Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%