2019
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2019.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic calibration of SWMM using NSGA-III and the effects of delineation scale on an urban catchment

Abstract: The study aims at calibration of the storm water management model (SWMM) with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-III (NSGA-III) for urban catchment in Hyderabad, India. The SWMM parameters calibrated were Manning's roughness coefficient (N), depression storage for pervious and impervious areas (DP and Di), sub-catchment width (W), curve number (CN), drying time (dry) of soil and percentage of imperviousness (I). The efficacy of calibration was evaluated by comparing the observed and simulated peak flows a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depth of water (d) was continuously updated with time by solving numerically by the model. The remaining parameter, Manning roughness value (n) was a variable [24]. Therefore, calibration was carried out on the n values, and it was suggested a range of 0.022 to 0.026 for smooth plain metal roof surfaces [20].…”
Section: ) Model Calibration and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth of water (d) was continuously updated with time by solving numerically by the model. The remaining parameter, Manning roughness value (n) was a variable [24]. Therefore, calibration was carried out on the n values, and it was suggested a range of 0.022 to 0.026 for smooth plain metal roof surfaces [20].…”
Section: ) Model Calibration and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration of any model can also be a time‐consuming process. A nondominated sorting genetic algorithm‐II (NSGA) was used for the autocalibration of SWMM applied to a catchment in Hyderabad, India (Swathi, Raju, Varma, & Sai Veena, 2019). The algorithm maximizes the NSE and correlation coefficient (CC) and minimizes the sum of squared errors (SSE) and percentage error in peak flow (PEP) to find the optimal calibrated parameters for a given rainfall event.…”
Section: General Stormwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the hydraulic models are calibrated manually [13], which is labour-intensive and presumes in-depth knowledge of the system's operating conditions. Therefore, automatic calibration (i.e., defining suitable model parameters using optimization algorithms) of a UDS model is suggested to find the values for the key parameters with minimal effort so that the model can accurately predict the response of the physical system, e.g., [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Jin et al [14] divided the calibration parameters into two groups: universal parameters that change in a relatively small space, and special parameters that can change in a larger space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%