2021
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2021.1907841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Tracking Approaches for Studying Online Media Use: A Critical Review and Recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, participants installed browser extensions that were specifically designed for the project and were based on the screen-scraping principle, namely capturing the web content appearing in the browser. Unlike other webtracking approaches (see Christner et al 2021 ), screen-scraping approaches allows capturing not only the URL visited by the participants, but also the actual content viewed in the browser (Supplementary Information file, Appendix A ). Limiting our sample to those who participated in both waves, agreed to webtracking, and answered all relevant survey items, the sample was composed of 367 participants…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, participants installed browser extensions that were specifically designed for the project and were based on the screen-scraping principle, namely capturing the web content appearing in the browser. Unlike other webtracking approaches (see Christner et al 2021 ), screen-scraping approaches allows capturing not only the URL visited by the participants, but also the actual content viewed in the browser (Supplementary Information file, Appendix A ). Limiting our sample to those who participated in both waves, agreed to webtracking, and answered all relevant survey items, the sample was composed of 367 participants…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances have produced an array of tools that allow researchers to measure SMU through various device or platform features [19]. Some approaches leverage native services to collect measures of usage duration or frequency for targeted applications [18], others collect such data via custom logging applications [20] or browser plugins [21], and others rely on data donations from participants (i.e., when participants supply researchers with usage data provided by platforms or devices) [22,23].…”
Section: Using Behavioural Measures Of Smumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After agreeing to participate in online tracking, each participant received a link to the website where extensions (i.e., plugins) for desktop versions of Chrome and Firefox browsers could be downloaded and installed. The extensions were designed specifically for the project and based on the screen-scraping principle, namely capturing HTMLs of web content appearing in the browser, where the extension was installed (Christner et al 2021). The captured HTML content together with the URL address of the page from which it was captured were sent to the remote server, where data were encrypted and stored.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study has two major limitations. First, we examine only desktop-based browsing behaviour because mobile-based tracking is notoriously complex to implement, especially in a waythat would make mobile data comparable with the the desktop one (Christner et al 2021). This is an important limitation given that mobile devices account for roughly a half of the global internet traffic.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation