2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated peroperative assessment of stents apposition from OCT pullbacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last years, several methods have been proposed to analyze OCT datasets in order to automatically detect the lumen contours [822] and stent struts [9,10,1618,20,2227]. In general, those automatic algorithms showed good results with respect to manual analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last years, several methods have been proposed to analyze OCT datasets in order to automatically detect the lumen contours [822] and stent struts [9,10,1618,20,2227]. In general, those automatic algorithms showed good results with respect to manual analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, those automatic algorithms showed good results with respect to manual analysis. However, algorithms for the identification of both lumen contours and stent struts, able to take into account the issues related to the presence of bifurcation branches, were reported only in few studies [10,16]. Moreover, validation of these algorithms was performed only against manual segmentation and their repeatability was not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 reports a list as comprehensive as possible of the studies published on this topic. While several studies presented a detection algorithm of the lumen contours [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 39 , 40 ] or the stent struts [ 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 27 , 29 , 32 ] only, in other works both detection algorithms were developed [ 14 , 16 , 17 , 25 , 28 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Automatic Segmentation Methods Of Oct Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This automated method achieved 0.91 recall and 0.84 precision. Another automatic method for the detection and assessment of struts apposition in OCT images was presented classifying the struts in 3 categories (covered, uncovered, malapposed) [4]. A four step algorithm was recently developed for preprocessing, lumen border detection, stent strut detection and 3D point cloud creation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%