2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated mapping of the intertidal beach bathymetry from video images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vousdoukas et al [47] obtained vertical RMS errors of 0.26 m using empirical formulations based on tidal and wave runup levels on the beach. Similarly, Uunk et al [36] mentioned elevation RMS errors between 0.28 and 0.34 m, the highest values being observed with a completely automated method. These uncertainties may in fact result from the underlying empirical relationships relating shoreline elevations to offshore wave characteristics and water levels [42].…”
Section: Comparing Video-to Lidar-based Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vousdoukas et al [47] obtained vertical RMS errors of 0.26 m using empirical formulations based on tidal and wave runup levels on the beach. Similarly, Uunk et al [36] mentioned elevation RMS errors between 0.28 and 0.34 m, the highest values being observed with a completely automated method. These uncertainties may in fact result from the underlying empirical relationships relating shoreline elevations to offshore wave characteristics and water levels [42].…”
Section: Comparing Video-to Lidar-based Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies suggest using a longer averaging period, usually 10 min TIMEX [4,28,36,39,43,65,68] to 15 min [69]. The methodological choice of long period time-averaged images is based on the time period of wave groups and the fact that a longer exposure enables a more complete "storage" of the processes on the beach such as wave breaking [21] that generate foam at the shoreline or over bars.…”
Section: Shoreline Detection and Elevation Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires the use of an image rectification procedure for measuring the observed relief changes. In combination with manual mapping by a conventional survey or DGPS, it may be a promising method for data collection for future computations (Uunk et al 2010). However, single cameras are used for collecting information and predicting dune-beach changes related to extreme storm surges or to management for touristic purposes.…”
Section: Other Visualisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a fully automated procedure to derive mainly beach width and elevation changes on video images or movies collected on a daily basis (Holland et al 1997;Uunk et al 2010). In order to obtain quantitative information from these images, several devices must be used.…”
Section: Other Visualisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, despite their high accuracy, these techniques cannot be understood as efficient tools to monitor dynamics with the frequency required by natural spaces. Some examples are: the Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and the Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) that allow to obtain high accuracy dense point clouds; the geodetics Global Positioning Systems (GPS) capable of defining a light Digital Elevation Model; the video imaging systems that enable to recreate the intertidal beach bathymetry (Uunk et al, 2010); and the remote sensing techniques that allow an accurate datum-based shoreline detection (Almonacid-Caballer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%