2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2960530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated In Vivo Navigation of Magnetic-Driven Microrobots Using OCT Imaging Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li and Wu et al [ 6 , 72 ] used OCT imaging as feedback to enable autonomous navigation of magnetic field actuated microrobots in vivo ( Figure 8 A). OCT has good depth-recognition capabilities, which can be compared to Dual photon fluorescent microscopes and confocal microscopes.…”
Section: Microrobot Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li and Wu et al [ 6 , 72 ] used OCT imaging as feedback to enable autonomous navigation of magnetic field actuated microrobots in vivo ( Figure 8 A). OCT has good depth-recognition capabilities, which can be compared to Dual photon fluorescent microscopes and confocal microscopes.…”
Section: Microrobot Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the most widely studied electromagnetically actuated microrobot as an example, in addition to magnetic field-based MRI and MPI imaging methods, optical and ionizing radiation and US imaging were combined with electromagnetic actuation systems for image-guided navigation of microrobots [ 88 , 108 , 109 , 110 ]. To solve the problem that the imaging resolution of MRI was insufficient to localize microrobots smaller than 100 m, Li et al [ 72 ] designed a microrobot navigation platform consisting of an electromagnetic actuation system and an OCT imaging system that can track microrobot movement at high scanning rates (5.5–70 kHz) and resolution (10 m). Other researchers used US imaging to track and image electromagnetically actuated magnetic particle populations, simply adding ultrasonic probes to electromagnetic actuation systems.…”
Section: Actuation and Imaging Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For in-vivo applications, obtaining the position information of the microrobot to establish a control loop is challenging, since the microrobot will be actuated inside the human body and conventional visual feedback becomes unfeasible, contrary to in-vitro applications [8], [9]. Therefore, other techniques of position feedback should be applied by using medical imaging devices [10], [11]. In addition, the microrobot should be retrievable or biodegradable so it does not stay in the human body after the required task is accomplished [12], in contrast with in-vitro applications in which the microrobot can either be disposed or retrieved easily from the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET and SPECT provide high sensitivity and molecular information, but the radiation dose remains the foremost concern when an extended use is required to monitor MNRs. Additionally, optical methods including fluorescence, [25] reflection-based IR imaging, [26] or optical coherence tomography (OCT), [27] have been used to track MNRs below scattering tissues with excellent spatiotemporal resolution but have been limited to sub-skin level or superficial medical applications (typically ≈1-2 mm in thick biological tissues). [28,29] Unfortunately, in optical methods, spatial resolution degrades significantly with depth due to pronounced light scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%