2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated estimation of item difficulty for multiple-choice tests: An application of word embedding techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we applied 55 statistically oriented association measures. For future research, we are excited to see that new computational algorithms for learning features embedded in language are burgeoning, such as HAL (Lund & Burgess, 1996), LSA (Landauer & Dumais, 1997), BEAGLE (Jones & Mewhort, 2007), Contextual_SOM (Zhao, Li, & Kohonen, 2011), and most recently, Word2Vec (Hsu, Lee, Chang, & Sung, 2018; Mikolov, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013). We look forward to more studies in the future on the design of new methods of measuring the strength of word associations using corpus data, or on how to transform techniques in related fields, such as NLP or AI, into word association measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we applied 55 statistically oriented association measures. For future research, we are excited to see that new computational algorithms for learning features embedded in language are burgeoning, such as HAL (Lund & Burgess, 1996), LSA (Landauer & Dumais, 1997), BEAGLE (Jones & Mewhort, 2007), Contextual_SOM (Zhao, Li, & Kohonen, 2011), and most recently, Word2Vec (Hsu, Lee, Chang, & Sung, 2018; Mikolov, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013). We look forward to more studies in the future on the design of new methods of measuring the strength of word associations using corpus data, or on how to transform techniques in related fields, such as NLP or AI, into word association measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most famous example is that the word “queen” can be derived from the vector-space word representations of “king,” “man,” and “woman”: The result of the vector subtraction of vec(“king”; i.e., the word vector of “king”) from vec(“man”) and the vector addition of vec(“woman”) is closer to vec(“queen”) than to any other word vector. More recently, researchers have used Word2Vec-based algorithms to identify linguistic relations beyond the word level (i.e., relations at the sentence, paragraph, and discourse levels), with initial successes being reported (Hsu et al, 2018; Tseng et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2016). Some studies have obtained effective results by grouping synonymous phrases and classifying short texts (e.g., Bansal & Srivastava, 2018; Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Approaches To Assessing Creativity and Dt Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) is an emerging computerized technology that relies on algorithms constructed by "learning" from training data, with the potential to revolutionize science assessments. Hsu et al [13] developed an ML method for automatically estimating the item difficulty of social studies tests that constructed a semantic space based on item elements of multiple-choice items, i.e., test stem, answer, and alternative options. With this, they showed that the new method outperformed the traditionally widespread yet resource-consuming pretesting method.…”
Section: Application Of ML To Length and Difficulty Level Of Items In Science Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, they showed that the new method outperformed the traditionally widespread yet resource-consuming pretesting method. A review study [13] included 49 machine-based studies on science assessments, finding that many studies (24 of 49) directly embedded ML in pedagogical activities. However, no study about the difficulty level concerning the lengths of an item's elements was reported, indicating a research gap in using ML techniques in science assessments.…”
Section: Application Of ML To Length and Difficulty Level Of Items In Science Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%