Proceedings of OCEANS '93
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1993.326072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated error detection in multibeam bathymetry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreign scholars have done a lot of research on the problem of MBES data denoising. In the early days, mathematical statistics were mainly used to detect noise [2][3], such as Ware method [4] and Du method [5]. These methods are not only low in automation, but also the accuracy of the terrain and the accuracy of denoising are not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign scholars have done a lot of research on the problem of MBES data denoising. In the early days, mathematical statistics were mainly used to detect noise [2][3], such as Ware method [4] and Du method [5]. These methods are not only low in automation, but also the accuracy of the terrain and the accuracy of denoising are not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined effect of these residual errors on sounding data will become notable as a range-dependent increase of depths and incident angles of beams leading to a lowquality bathymetric result, shown in Fig. 2 (Canepa et al 2003;Okada et al 2012;Shaw and Arnold 1993). Unfortunately, these residual errors have random characteristics following Gaussian distribution, and so it is hard to estimate them accurately in sounding data processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], multiple filtering methods for PFM systems were adopted. Two algorithms for identifying subtle outlier errors in a variety of multibeam systems were developed in [7]. The first algorithm based on robust estimation of autoregressive (AR) model parameters treats the swath as a sequence of images; the other algorithm is based on energy minimization techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%