2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection and measurement of individual sorghum panicles using density-based clustering of terrestrial lidar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the two performance metrics, the estimated panicle count compared very well with the measured panicle count in each plot (Figure 8), which shows promise for the application of deep learning approaches for such a plant phenotyping task. The level of counting accuracy (94%) achieved in this study is an improvement from our previous study [5] (89.3%) that applied terrestrial lidar data and a density-based clustering approach. While different input data were used, we attribute the increased performance in this study to the deep learning model applied.…”
Section: Panicle Counting Performance and Field-level Panicle Mappingmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the two performance metrics, the estimated panicle count compared very well with the measured panicle count in each plot (Figure 8), which shows promise for the application of deep learning approaches for such a plant phenotyping task. The level of counting accuracy (94%) achieved in this study is an improvement from our previous study [5] (89.3%) that applied terrestrial lidar data and a density-based clustering approach. While different input data were used, we attribute the increased performance in this study to the deep learning model applied.…”
Section: Panicle Counting Performance and Field-level Panicle Mappingmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Reference Estimated The level of counting accuracy (94%) achieved in this study is an improvement from our previous study [5] (89.3%) that applied terrestrial lidar data and a density-based clustering approach. While different input data were used, we attribute the increased performance in this study to the deep learning model applied.…”
Section: Plot Nomentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the last 5 years, different approaches have been excogitated with promising capabilities of recording sorghum phenology in field environments. Some of these include various UAS platforms [17,18], field-based robotic phenotyping system [19], unmanned aerial system [20], ultrasonic sensors [21], the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [22], the time of flight cameras [23], tomography imaging [24], Kinect v2 camera [21], RGB and NIR imaging [25], and Phenobot 1.0 [26]. The next-generation phenomics tools generate enormous amount of data that are being translated via machine-learning statistical approaches into trait descriptions, relevant to sorghum breeders [27].…”
Section: Analyzing Sorghum Biomass Potential 21 Phenotyping Biomass mentioning
confidence: 99%