1995
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-60246-1_160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automata for the modal μ-calculus and related results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) The labelled transition systems from [12] can be represented as coalgebras for the functor PΦ × P A , i.e. for the functor that maps a set S to the set PΦ × (PS) A .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The labelled transition systems from [12] can be represented as coalgebras for the functor PΦ × P A , i.e. for the functor that maps a set S to the set PΦ × (PS) A .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a corollary of this result and Proposition 3.5, MSO (see Example 2.9) is in fact a coalgebraic fixpoint logic. Theorem 3.10 below can be seen as a more precise formulation of Fact 1.3; as mentioned there, the two statements can be found in Walukiewicz [23] and Janin & Walukiewicz [12], respectively. Theorem 3.10 1.…”
Section: Qedmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This link between logic and automata theory essentially goes back to the work of Rabin and Büchi on stream and tree automata. The two statements in Fact 1.3 below can be found in Walukiewicz [23] and Janin & Walukiewicz [12], respectively. Fact 1.3 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Intuitively, while a nondeterministic tree automaton that visits a node of the input tree sends exactly one copy of itself to each of the successors of the node, an alternating automaton can send several copies of itself to the same successor. A Symmetric alternating tree automaton [15,25] does not distinguish between the different successors of a node, and can send copies of itself only in a universal or an existential manner, possibly with ε-transitions. We use a partition of the state space of the automaton in order to denote the type of transitions from it.…”
Section: Alternating Parity Tree Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%