2008
DOI: 10.2168/lmcs-4(4:10)2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalgebraic Automata Theory: Basic Results

Abstract: Abstract. We generalize some of the central results in automata theory to the abstraction level of coalgebras and thus lay out the foundations of a universal theory of automata operating on infinite objects.Let F be any set functor that preserves weak pullbacks. We show that the class of recognizable languages of F-coalgebras is closed under taking unions, intersections, and projections. We also prove that if a nondeterministic F-automaton accepts some coalgebra it accepts a finite one of the size of the autom… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same process has been recently generalized to F -coalgebras in [10]. In this paper, we use a different approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same process has been recently generalized to F -coalgebras in [10]. In this paper, we use a different approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation, which is closely linked to fundamental automata-theoretic constructions, lies at the heart of the theory of the modal μ-calculus, and has many applications, see for instance [5,27]. Generalizing the link between fix-point logics and automata theory to the coalgebraic level of generality, Kupke & Venema [15] generalized some of these observations to show that many fundamental results in automata theory are really theorems of universal coalgebra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A similar argument can be made for the distributive laws (see e.g. [21]) that underlie our treatment of bisimulation quantifiers. On the other hand, this simplicity comes at a price: the loss of monotonicity.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It is known that X ∈ Base(X ) and moreover Base(X ) is the smallest subset of P(Σ) with this property [21,Proposition 6.7]. Using the notion of base, we can characterise satisfiability of ∇-formulae as follows.…”
Section: Definition 21 If σ ⊆ F(t ) Is Finite and X ∈ T P(σ)mentioning
confidence: 99%