2017
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.120661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous Platelet‐Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of 3‐Wall Intrabony Defects in Aggressive Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract: Within the limits of the present study, there is greater bone fill at sites treated with PRF with conventional OFD than conventional OFD alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure adequate intraexaminer reproducibility, the examiner was calibrated before the beginning of the study in some trials. [ 2 , 3 , 5 – 7 , 12 , 13 , 15 ] Three studies were placebo-controlled, triple-masked trials. [ 2 , 12 , 14 ] Three studies were double–blinded clinical trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure adequate intraexaminer reproducibility, the examiner was calibrated before the beginning of the study in some trials. [ 2 , 3 , 5 – 7 , 12 , 13 , 15 ] Three studies were placebo-controlled, triple-masked trials. [ 2 , 12 , 14 ] Three studies were double–blinded clinical trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 , 12 , 14 ] Three studies were double–blinded clinical trials. [ 13 , 15 , 16 ] The details of the risk of bias are illustrated in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other three tooth extraction trials showed no significant difference in bone formation between PRF and blank control groups [48, 49] or between PRF and PRP on radiographic evaluation [50]. In controlled trials of inflammation-induced bone defect, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [51, 52] proved that PRF enhanced bone fill in IBD compared with open flap debridement (OFD) only. In a study, 13 patients with 26 IBD sites were divided into the PRF or OFD alone groups; the percentage of bone fill in PRF sites was 45.18% ± 7.57%, while the percentage of bone fill in OFD sites was 21.6% ± 9.3% ( p = 0.001) on radiographic evidence at 12 months [51].…”
Section: Effect Of Prf On Human Oral and Maxillofacial Bone Regenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study, 13 patients with 26 IBD sites were divided into the PRF or OFD alone groups; the percentage of bone fill in PRF sites was 45.18% ± 7.57%, while the percentage of bone fill in OFD sites was 21.6% ± 9.3% ( p = 0.001) on radiographic evidence at 12 months [51]. In another study, 17 patients with 54 IBD sites were divided into the PRF or OFD alone group, and PRF (46.14% ± 11.39%) caused a greater percentage change in IBD depth than at the OFD sites (15.76% ± 18.77%) at 9 months ( p < 0.001) [52] radiologically. However, a controlled trial [53] revealed that PRF did not contribute to bone regeneration radiographically.…”
Section: Effect Of Prf On Human Oral and Maxillofacial Bone Regenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRF is a fibrin 3-D polymerized matrix in which platelet cytokine, leucocytes, growth factors (like PDGFs, TGFβ, epidermal growth factor EGF and insulin like growth factor-1, IGF-1) and presence of circulating stem cells are trapped [11,12]. It has been defined as an autologous leucocyte and platelet rich fibrin biomaterial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%