1984
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(84)90088-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoignition in methanehydrogen mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
69
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energies derived from eq. (1) proposed by Cheng and Oppenheim [13] for the same methane/hydrogen mixtures with hydrogen amountof-substance fractions of 0, 5%, 10%, and 20% were 53.4, 51.6, 49.8, and 46.2 kcal/mol, respectively. A comparison of the experimental and calculated activation energies reveals some differences.…”
Section: Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The activation energies derived from eq. (1) proposed by Cheng and Oppenheim [13] for the same methane/hydrogen mixtures with hydrogen amountof-substance fractions of 0, 5%, 10%, and 20% were 53.4, 51.6, 49.8, and 46.2 kcal/mol, respectively. A comparison of the experimental and calculated activation energies reveals some differences.…”
Section: Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The ignition delay time was measured under stoichiometric conditions at 1.5-7.0 MPa and 950-1060 K. Their results showed that the ignition delay times of the methane/hydrogen mixtures reduced as the hydrogen amount-of-substance fraction increased, and this effect was enhanced at higher temperatures and attenuated at higher pressures. Huang et al [12] also found the ignition promotion effect was reduced at lower temperatures in their study of the ignition delay time of methane/hydrogen/air mixtures in a shock tube setup using engine relevant conditions at 1.6-4.0 MPa and 1000-1300 K. Cheng and Oppenheimer [13] conducted experiments at 800-2000 K and 0.1-0.3 MPa, and correlated the ignition delay times of pure methane, pure hydrogen, and their mixtures according to the following empirical formula:…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the strictest sense, the published mechanism was therefore not "comprehensive", a term originally applied by Westbrook and Dryer [3,4] to describe a mechanism developed by comparison against a number of different sources of kinetic data. These sources frequently include laminar flame speed measurements [5][6][7][8], shock tube ignition delay studies [9][10][11][12][13][14], and other sources such as static and stirred reactors. New flame speed experimental results using H 2 /O 2 /He mixtures at pressures ranging from 1 to 20 atm appear to be poorly predicted by the Mueller et al mechanism [7], while predictions of similar experiments using H 2 /O 2 mixtures in argon, helium and nitrogen at 1 to 3 atm pressure are quite reasonable [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignition delay time of 80 msec was measured for conditions of φ = 0.3, 2,026 kPa (20 atm), and inlet temperature of 727 K (849 F) [9]. Ignition delay time is highly dependent upon the percentage of hydrogen in the fuel stock and inlet temperature [10]. Therefore, the ignition delay time for the HHF are expected to be much shorter than 80 msec.…”
Section: Figure 2: Conceptual Illustration Of Injector Layout For Sinmentioning
confidence: 99%