2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autogenous Bone Grafting of Uncontained Bony Defects of Tibia During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the bone graft was rigidly fixed with cannulated cancellous screws. Although some reports have described wire fixation 16 and screwless fixation, 15 in the current study, screws were used to achieve rigid initial fixation. The strength of this fixation can be tested under the mechanical forces associated with insertion of the implant keel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most cases, the bone graft was rigidly fixed with cannulated cancellous screws. Although some reports have described wire fixation 16 and screwless fixation, 15 in the current study, screws were used to achieve rigid initial fixation. The strength of this fixation can be tested under the mechanical forces associated with insertion of the implant keel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although Laskin 12 reported only a 67% success rate, subsequent studies showed better results. [13][14][15][16] In a study of 54 cases, all achieved bone union, but the length of the stem and the type of prosthesis varied between cases. 19 Differences in implants can change the stress within the tibia and significantly affect the union between the graft and recipient bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The failure rate of bone grafting at 6.8 years after TKRA was reported as 3% in the study by Watanabe et al17). Ahmed et al18) reported there was no case of failure during 10 years of follow-up period. We have used autogenous bone grafts obtained during tibial resection for contained defects and attempted to restore bone quality with the use of autogenous or allogenic bone grafts in young patients with non-contained defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cementation would have had the advantage of providing immediate stability [15,16], though would not have functioned as a biological scaffold, and might have caused thermal necrosis of the surrounding bone possibly leading to further osteolysis [17,18]. Autologous bone grafting was also considered because of its biological advantages, as well as its proven record in dealing with small tibial bony defects [19], and with impaction grafting in knee and hip revision arthroplasty [20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%