2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoDIAL: Automatic Domain Alignment Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
284
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
284
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional methods for domain adaptation involve minimizing some measure of distance between the source and * This work was done when Yunsheng Li is an intern at Microsoft Cloud & AI the target distributions. Two commonly used measures are the first and second order moment [2], and learning the distance metrics using Adversarial approaches [34,35]. Both approaches have had good success in the classification problems (e.g., MNIST [16], USPS [7] and SVHN [22]); however, as pointed out in [37], their performance is quite limited on the semantic segmentation problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for domain adaptation involve minimizing some measure of distance between the source and * This work was done when Yunsheng Li is an intern at Microsoft Cloud & AI the target distributions. Two commonly used measures are the first and second order moment [2], and learning the distance metrics using Adversarial approaches [34,35]. Both approaches have had good success in the classification problems (e.g., MNIST [16], USPS [7] and SVHN [22]); however, as pointed out in [37], their performance is quite limited on the semantic segmentation problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlexNet [41] (DDC) [9], domain-adversarial training of neural networks (DANN) [15], deep-CORAL (D-CORAL) [13], deep adaptation networks (DAN) [10], deep reconstruction classification network (DRCN) [44], residual transfer network (RTN) [11], joint adaptation network (JAN) [12], domain adaptive hashing (DAH) [26], adversarial discriminative aomain adaptation (ADDA) [16], automatic domain alignment layers (AutoDIAL) [17], and multi-adversarial domain adaptation (MADA) [45]. For the PACS dataset, Office-31 and…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] proposed to align the source and target distributions by minimizing the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD). Driven by a similar motivation, Adaptive Batch Normalization (AdaBN) [20] and AutoDial [22] align the distributions via modified batch normalization layers. Domain Adversarial Neural Networks (DANN) [8] aim at aligning the distributions by using a domain discriminator and train the model adversarially in order to make the feature space indistinguishable for the different domains.…”
Section: A Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%