2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2004.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoantibodies in SLE but not in scleroderma react with protein-stripped nucleosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having shown enhancement for purified DNA, we next tested nucleosomes as the antigen. As shown in Fig 2 and S2 Table, a PLL pre-coat augmented binding to nucleosomes; antibodies to nucleosomes commonly co-exist with antibodies to DNA and represent overlapping specificities, although, depending on the preparation, nucleosomes may contain other antigens [38]. In the context of these experiments, these findings suggest that nucleosomes can bind PLL to increase the concentration of antigen on the plate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Having shown enhancement for purified DNA, we next tested nucleosomes as the antigen. As shown in Fig 2 and S2 Table, a PLL pre-coat augmented binding to nucleosomes; antibodies to nucleosomes commonly co-exist with antibodies to DNA and represent overlapping specificities, although, depending on the preparation, nucleosomes may contain other antigens [38]. In the context of these experiments, these findings suggest that nucleosomes can bind PLL to increase the concentration of antigen on the plate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…10 Second-generation anti-nucleosome ELISAs utilized chromatin chemically stripped of H1 and other loosely bound proteins like Scl-70 and, therefore, achieved superior diagnostic performance in SLE. 17 Interestingly, ELISAs using the strong adhesive property of nucleosomes (instead of commonly used linkers like methylated albumin, protamine sulfate or poly-L-lysine) to attach dsDNA to the plate, showed even higher diagnostic performance in SLE, and outperformed even the Farr assay. 14 …”
Section: Diagnostic Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of anti-nucleosomal antibodies (ANuA) in SLE sera is reported to be approximately 60% [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. Several studies analysed the diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of ANuA using different antigen sources and detection methods, and their relationship to anti-dsDNA antibodies [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Anti-nucleosomes (Chromatin)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies analysed the diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of ANuA using different antigen sources and detection methods, and their relationship to anti-dsDNA antibodies [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. Some studies reported that ANuA assays had a higher sensitivity than anti-dsDNA for SLE while other studies did not confirm this finding [61,69].…”
Section: Anti-nucleosomes (Chromatin)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation