2016
DOI: 10.1177/0961203316640922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoantibodies, complement and type I interferon as biomarkers for personalized medicine in SLE

Abstract: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a mysterious disease, presenting with extremely divergent clinical phenotypes. Already, biomarkers are very helpful tools for diagnosis, assessment and monitoring of disease activity, differential diagnosis of clinical manifestations, prediction of the disease course and stratified therapy, and they hold the key to personalized medicine in SLE. We summarize the clinical information that can only be supplied by autoantibodies, complement components and interferon biomar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our correlation analysis cannot be confirmed as causality, it clearly highlights the association of the increased expression of Type I IFN response genes with the master regulators of B cell development, and differentiation into plasma cells might be of pivotal importance in the generation of autoantibodies in RA, which has been already described in SLE (76) and some myopathies (77). Further mechanistic studies are needed to confirm such association and describe the detailed mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although our correlation analysis cannot be confirmed as causality, it clearly highlights the association of the increased expression of Type I IFN response genes with the master regulators of B cell development, and differentiation into plasma cells might be of pivotal importance in the generation of autoantibodies in RA, which has been already described in SLE (76) and some myopathies (77). Further mechanistic studies are needed to confirm such association and describe the detailed mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In SLE, IP-10 was shown to correlate with disease activity cross-sectionally and longitudinally and therefore might be useful as an IFN biomarker in clincial practice in SLE 37. In pSS, IP-10 was shown to be involved in lymphocyte infiltration into glandular tissue of patients with pSS 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upregulation of IP-10 in response to IFN-α and IFN-γ is ∼50-fold higher compared to the upregulation of SIGLEC1. This could speak in favor that IP-10 is more acutely induced during the immune response and might be an explanation why there is a correlation to the flaring and waning disease course in SLE16 37 but not to the chronic disease course in pSS. Moreover, Smiljanovic et al 14 and others showed that SIGLEC1 is mainly upregulated by IFN-α,32 while IP-10 equally responds to IFN-α and IFN-γ 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a low number but could be attributed to disease control, as patients were sampled outside of flares. The differential genes identified in association with SLE patients belonged largely to interferon signaling pathways mediated by pattern recognition receptors; notably, a type I interferon signature has been reported as a potential biomarker for personalized medicine in SLE [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%