Authorship and Bylines

Castillo, Maurício

doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1636

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, ombuds offices [ 31 ] or committees [ 7 ] at institutions could conceivably play a role, but not every institution has such offices. Research compliance or research integrity offices [ 50 ] might be relevant if misconduct was involved, but authorship disputes can arise that involve no misconduct. Because the standards for authorship placement are vague, any administrator or office charged with ensuring compliance might reasonably ask what standards the researchers are supposed to be complying with.…”

Section: Authorship Disputes Are Difficult To Resolvementioning

confidence: 99%

“…By submitting a manuscript to a journal, authors implicitly recognize the editor’s authority to decide what goes into a journal. Some suggest this is part of an editor’s responsibility [ 18 ], and some editors find that authors are responsive to requests to shorten author lists [ 50 ]. But it seems unfair and unwise to expect editors to resolve authorship disputes on their own [ 37 ].…”

Section: Authorship Disputes Are Difficult To Resolvementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration

Faulkes

2018

Res Integr Peer Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDisputes over authorship are increasing. This paper examines the options that researchers have in resolving authorship disputes. Discussions about authorship disputes often address how to prevent disputes but rarely address how to resolve them. Both individuals and larger research communities are harmed by the limited options for dispute resolution.Main bodyWhen authorship disputes arise after publication, most existing guidelines recommend that the authors work out the disputes between themselves. But this is unlikely to occur, because there are often large power differentials between team members, and institutions (e.g., universities, funding agencies) are unlikely to have authority over all team members. Other collaborative disciplines that deal with issues of collaborative creator credit could provide models for scientific authorship. Arbitration or mediation could provide solutions to authorship disputes where few presently exist. Because authors recognize journals’ authority to make decisions about manuscripts submitted to the journal, journals are well placed to facilitate alternative dispute resolution processes.ConclusionRather than viewing authorship disputes as rare events that must be handled on a case by case basis, researchers and journals should view the potential for disputes as predictable, preventable, and soluble. Independent bodies that can offer alternative dispute resolution services to scientific collaborators and/or journals could quickly help research communities, particularly their most vulnerable members.

show abstract

Section: Authorship Disputes Are Difficult To Resolvementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Authorship Disputes Are Difficult To Resolvementioning

confidence: 99%

Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration

Faulkes

2018

Res Integr Peer Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Esto se traduce en situaciones extremadamente complejas, donde se generan categorías indebidas de autoría (7)(8)(9) , entre las que cabe mencionar:…”

Section: ¿Qué Es Autoría?unclassified

Autoría en Artículos Biomédicos: El Caso De Imaginología

Fuente-Alba

2010

Rev. chil. radiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The definition of authorship is a subject of ongoing discussion wherein elements of prestige and academic career are involved. As a potential source of conflicts, it must be handled with extreme strictness to avoid difficulties when presenting scientific outcomes. Both a review of international standards relating to regarding authorship, accepted to date, and the position of the editorial board of the Revista Chilena de Radiología are presented.

show abstract

“…Misconducts reported in scientific publication are mostly around authorship. Although the criteria for authorship have been delineated a long time back by several authorities, it is still misused 1 . Probably this is because of the undue craze of personal and institutional credit, and promotion in the job, etc.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite all these measures, the unethical authorship reportedly remained unabated. 1 The whisper of "cost", "ghost" and "gift" authors are still audible. It was found in 2008 in one-in-five journals 3 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%