2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1542>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors as citers over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
129
0
11

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
129
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, an assumption in the current analyses is that those with the most published articles are responsible for driving progress in this field. Checking an author's citation identity or citation image (White, 2001) would provide further information on his or her impact by examining the relationship between the number of articles produced and how often those articles are cited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an assumption in the current analyses is that those with the most published articles are responsible for driving progress in this field. Checking an author's citation identity or citation image (White, 2001) would provide further information on his or her impact by examining the relationship between the number of articles produced and how often those articles are cited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the authors of such articles more likely belong, or have access, to separate research networks than authors from one country. It is known from White [25] and Mählck and Persson [14] that researchers tend to cite articles written by researchers with whom they have a personal acquaintance. (2) Complementary competencies : The rationale behind international cooperation in research may be that this provides access to highly competent researchers, thus resulting in high quality research which will be more frequently cited.…”
Section: Model Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, sceptics of citation analysis have argued that this makes research evaluation based on citation analysis an invalid evaluation method (MacRoberts andMacRoberts 1996, Seglen 1997). Conversely, proponents have defended citation analysis by arguing that as long as citation analyses are based on many reference lists, results are valid (e.g., Narin 1987, Nederhof and Van Raan 1987, Small 1987, White 2001. The sceptics have countered this by claiming that this would only be true if bias were distributed randomly, but biased citing, they claim, is not random (MacRoberts 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%