2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41545-019-0033-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Author Correction: Chlorination disadvantages and alternative routes for biofouling control in reverse osmosis desalination

Abstract: In the original version of this Review Article the affiliation and address for Lorenzo Rosa were incorrectly given as “University of Parma, Department of Information Engineering, Parma 43121, Italy”.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water scarcity is a rising issue across the world . Less than 1% of the world’s water supplies are available as freshwater in rivers, lakes, and groundwater. , With increasing freshwater demand due to population growth and higher water consumption in industries, desalination techniques could be crucial to tap into the abundant saline water to fulfill the requirements. However, saline water sources often contain a multitude of ions in addition to sodium chloride (NaCl) that should be addressed when considering desalination. Some of the ions that are harmful need to be entirely removed, such as arsenic, while other ions (such as fluoride) can be beneficial in smaller quantities and should ideally be optimally removed . This necessitates the development of technologies that can remove all kinds of ions from multi-ion solutions and, at the same time, preferably remove only the desired amounts of each ion species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water scarcity is a rising issue across the world . Less than 1% of the world’s water supplies are available as freshwater in rivers, lakes, and groundwater. , With increasing freshwater demand due to population growth and higher water consumption in industries, desalination techniques could be crucial to tap into the abundant saline water to fulfill the requirements. However, saline water sources often contain a multitude of ions in addition to sodium chloride (NaCl) that should be addressed when considering desalination. Some of the ions that are harmful need to be entirely removed, such as arsenic, while other ions (such as fluoride) can be beneficial in smaller quantities and should ideally be optimally removed . This necessitates the development of technologies that can remove all kinds of ions from multi-ion solutions and, at the same time, preferably remove only the desired amounts of each ion species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, RO membranes are used to reduce the ionic content of water and work in conjunction with other techniques which reduce the organics and microbial content (disinfection) of the water prior to it being passed through the RO membrane. Managing the biological matter is a prerequisite to reduce the membrane biofouling propensity of the water and subsequent propagation of water-based infections (Al-Abri et al, 2019;Wang Y. H. et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies for water disinfection have constantly evolved with time, from simple sedimentation processes to chemical treatments and advanced oxidation techniques including chlorination and ozonation (von Gunten, 2003;Richardson and Postigo, 2012;Ding et al, 2019). Among them, chlorination is the most widely used technique providing both primary and residual disinfection, albeit with certain disadvantages (Kimbrough and Suffet, 2002;Hua and Reckhow, 2007;Richardson and Postigo, 2012;Al-Abri et al, 2019;Stefán et al, 2019;Zhong et al, 2019). However it is fast being replaced with new technologies like photocatalysis, UV light treatment, ultrasonication, magnetic enhanced disinfection, and electrochemical methods (Baruah et al, 2012;Bora et al, 2017;Cheema et al, 2018;Cho et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2019;Wang C. et al, 2019;You et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozonation produces fewer byproducts but it is more expensive than chlorination. UV treatment does not leave residual products; however, it does not protect against future infections in the distribution network and it is unsuitable to treat turbid water as the light cannot penetrate [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%