2017
DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2017.1372031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authentically enhancing the learning and development environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming to be specific within the engineering field, constructivism can be an extremely valid pedagogical approach since the profession of engineers increasingly requires that the individual take ownership of their training (focused on deep knowledge). Therefore, the university needs to "equip" the students with a methodology that develops the critical thinking necessary for the future (Cavenett, 2017). According to the constructivist theory, it is necessary to shift from a perspective focused on teaching (training from the educator/trainer perspective) to one focused on learning (training from the perspective of the learner).…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to be specific within the engineering field, constructivism can be an extremely valid pedagogical approach since the profession of engineers increasingly requires that the individual take ownership of their training (focused on deep knowledge). Therefore, the university needs to "equip" the students with a methodology that develops the critical thinking necessary for the future (Cavenett, 2017). According to the constructivist theory, it is necessary to shift from a perspective focused on teaching (training from the educator/trainer perspective) to one focused on learning (training from the perspective of the learner).…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite persons with disability being recognised as one of the six under-represented groups in the Australian academy and subsequent Dawkins accessibility reforms, ongoing Australian Government monitoring reveals that disparity with non-equity groups continues (Dawkins, 1990 cited in Productivity Commission, 2019). Less than one-fifth (i.e., 17%) of Australian workers with disability have completed a Bachelor Degree or higher compared to almost one-third (i.e., 30.1%) of non-disabled workers (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2015 cited in Cavenett, 2017, p. 901). Hemphill and Kulik (2016a) also cautioned that employer tendency to consider engaging persons with disability is lessening and the obstacles to employment opportunity continue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advantages of digital technologies, a large number of data ranging from students' online engagement to grades are available for both face-to-face and online courses in Australian universities; these course analytics data can be observed and analysed in order to improve the quality of teaching and learning environments. There is a global pressure to reform the engineering educational curriculum and teaching and learning environment so that the graduate capabilities of students can be achieved [1,2]. Well defined learning objectives of a course are usually assessed using multiple grading systems, as a single grading system may not be able to measure students' understandings on course objectives [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well defined learning objectives of a course are usually assessed using multiple grading systems, as a single grading system may not be able to measure students' understandings on course objectives [3]. Cavenett [1] criticised the tradition grading systems of engineering courses and mentioned that there is more focus on assessing the hard technical knowledge and narrow focus on soft skills including professionalism, teamwork and communication. Sustainable development concepts are also required to be included in the curriculum and assessment tasks to make engineering graduates ready for the twenty-first century [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%